Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 COLOPre 06/13] tools/libxl: Introduce a new internal API libxl__domain_unpause()

[Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/11/2015 05:42 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 17:09 +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> On 06/11/2015 04:43 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 10:21 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/10/2015 11:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:43 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote:
>>>>>> From: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The guest is paused after libxl_domain_create_restore().
>>>>>> Secondary vm is running in colo mode. So we need to unpause
>>>>>> the guest. The current API libxl_domain_unpause() is
>>>>>> not an internal API. Introduce a new API to support it.
>>>>>> No functional change.
>>>>>
>>>>> In general there is nothing wrong with using a public function
>>>>> internally. Is there some special consideration here?
>>>>
>>>> It's just that we thought it's better to use internal functions for
>>>> internal purpose.
>>>> Most the public functions take ctx as the first param, the internal 
>>>> functions
>>>> take gc/egc as the first param(although we can get ctx from gcs and call
>>>> public functions when needed).
>>>> If it doesn't matter, we can drop this patch.
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter so you can, yes.
>>
>> If the public API creates a new AO, it is safe to call it directly?
> 
> A public function which takes an ao_how is, I believe, an exception to
> this rule and should be annotated with LIBXL_EXTERNAL_CALLERS_ONLY to
> prevent accidents.
> 
> I don't think libxl_domain_unpause is such a function though.

OK, we will drop this patch.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> Ian.
> 
> 
> .
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel