[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v3][PATCH 02/16] xen/x86/p2m: introduce set_identity_p2m_entry
>>> On 11.06.15 at 03:15, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We will create this sort of identity mapping as follows: > > If the gfn space is unoccupied, we just set the mapping. If the space > is already occupied by 1:1 mappings, do nothing. Failed for any > other cases. > > Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> First of all you continue to be copying each patch to every maintainer involved in some part of the series. Please limit the Cc list of each patch to the actual list of people needing to be Cc-ed on it (or you know explicitly wanting a copy). > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > @@ -898,6 +898,41 @@ int set_mmio_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, unsigned long > gfn, mfn_t mfn, > return set_typed_p2m_entry(d, gfn, mfn, p2m_mmio_direct, access); > } > > +int set_identity_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, > + p2m_access_t p2ma) > +{ > + p2m_type_t p2mt; > + p2m_access_t a; > + mfn_t mfn; > + struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(d); > + int ret; > + > + if ( paging_mode_translate(p2m->domain) ) > + { > + gfn_lock(p2m, gfn, 0); > + > + mfn = p2m->get_entry(p2m, gfn, &p2mt, &a, 0, NULL); > + > + if ( p2mt == p2m_invalid || mfn_x(mfn) == INVALID_MFN ) I'm not fundamentally opposed to this extra INVALID_MFN check, but could you please clarify for which P2M type you saw INVALID_MFN coming back here, and for which p2m_invalid cases you didn't also see INVALID_MFN? I.e. I'd really prefer a single check to be used when that can cover all cases. > + ret = p2m_set_entry(p2m, gfn, _mfn(gfn), PAGE_ORDER_4K, > + p2m_mmio_direct, p2ma); > + else if ( mfn_x(mfn) == gfn && p2mt == p2m_mmio_direct && a == p2ma ) > + ret = 0; > + else > + { > + ret = -EBUSY; > + printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING > + "Cannot identity map d%d:%lx, already mapped to %lx.\n", > + d->domain_id, gfn, mfn_x(mfn)); > + } > + > + gfn_unlock(p2m, gfn, 0); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} Either have a single return point, or invert the original if() and bail early (reducing the indentation level on the main body of the code). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |