[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 10.06.15 at 14:56, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 12:48 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> But I guess you could at least check >> what microcode the box has in use - if there's nothing newer available, >> then trying to get the microcode updating working isn't of immediate >> importance anymore (but of course it would still be nice to have in >> place). > > I logged into fiano1 while it was running under Xen: > > cpuinfo contains (just the first processor for brevity): > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 62 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2403 v2 @ 1.80GHz > stepping : 4 > microcode : 0x416 Peeking into the microcode files I have lying around, 0x428 ought to be available for that family+model+stepping. >> > Can't we get Intel involved right away? >> >> Sure we can; I just generally prefer not to bother people with >> problems they already solved, but maybe that's the wrong approach >> a case like this. > > Is the list of errata fixed by a given ucode update public? If not then > I think we've done sufficient due diligence that we should feel ok to > ask, even if the answer turns out to be fixed in microcode. No, Intel isn't doing as good a job as AMD in that regard. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |