[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 33/41] arm : acpi prepare acpi tables for dom0
On 17/05/2015 21:04, Parth Dixit wrote: Map acpi tables described in uefi table to DOM0 address space Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c index f2ca525..90bdd01 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c @@ -1225,6 +1225,50 @@ static int handle_node(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo, return res; } #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +static int prepare_acpi(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo, struct membank tbl_add[]) +{ + unsigned long res; + u64 addr, size; + int i = 0; + + addr = acpi_os_get_root_pointer(); + if( !addr ) + return -ENODEV; + + size = sizeof(struct acpi_table_rsdp); + + res = map_regions(d, + paddr_to_pfn(addr & PAGE_MASK), + DIV_ROUND_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE), + paddr_to_pfn(addr & PAGE_MASK)); + if ( res ) + { + printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to map 0x%"PRIx64 + " - 0x%"PRIx64" in domain \n", + addr & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_ALIGN(addr + size) - 1); + return res; + } + + for( i = 0; i < acpi_gbl_root_table_list.count; i++ ) The description of the patch suggest that you will use acpi_mem introduced in patch #29 but you are using acpi_glb_root_table_list. Please either update the commit message or change the loop. IHMO, the latter would be cleaner. + { + addr = acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables[i].address; + size = acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables[i].length; + res = map_regions(d, + paddr_to_pfn(addr & PAGE_MASK), + DIV_ROUND_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE), + paddr_to_pfn(addr & PAGE_MASK)); + if ( res ) + { + printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to map 0x%"PRIx64 + " - 0x%"PRIx64" in domain \n", + addr & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_ALIGN(addr + size) - 1); + return res; + } + } + + return 0; +} + static int estimate_acpi_size(struct domain *d,struct kernel_info *kinfo, struct membank tbl_add[]) { int size = 0; @@ -1429,6 +1473,10 @@ static int create_acpi_dtb(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo, struct m { return -EINVAL; } +static int prepare_acpi(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo, struct membank tbl_add[]) +{ BUG(); + return -EINVAL; +} #endif static int prepare_dtb(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo) { @@ -1647,10 +1695,19 @@ int construct_dom0(struct domain *d) * as the initrd & fdt in RAM, so call it first. */ kernel_load(&kinfo); + + if ( !acpi_disabled ) + { + rc = prepare_acpi(d, &kinfo, tbl_add); + if ( rc < 0 ) + return rc; + } + /* initrd_load will fix up the fdt, so call it before dtb_load */ initrd_load(&kinfo); /* Allocate the event channel IRQ and fix up the device tree */ - evtchn_fixup(d, &kinfo); + if( acpi_disabled ) + evtchn_fixup(d, &kinfo); This change doesn't belong to this patch. dtb_load(&kinfo); /* Now that we are done restore the original p2m and current. */ Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |