Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] xen: Use existing __section() macro instead of opencoding it

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 14:42 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.06.15 at 14:29, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:20 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 05.06.15 at 15:31, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > No functional change
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> >> > CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> >> > CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >  xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c         |    2 +-
> >> >  xen/arch/x86/mm.c              |    3 +--
> >> >  xen/arch/x86/setup.c           |    2 +-
> >> >  xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c       |    6 ++----
> >> >  xen/include/asm-arm/device.h   |    2 +-
> >> >  xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h |    2 +-
> >> >  6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> Not having seen a ARM maintainer ack so far, I decided to commit
> >> only the x86 parts.
> > 
> > It was only posted Friday afternoon.
> 
> Right, and this wasn't meant as a complaint or anything; I
> simply wanted to get it off my plate, but didn't want to drop
> bits silently. I suppose it would have been better to submit
> these as independent x86 and ARM patches anyway...
> 
> > Anyway: Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> And now also committed and pushed.

Thanks.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel