[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond
>>> On 08.06.15 at 12:43, <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > b) Do we actually have or should have a definition of > experimental/preview/supported/deprecated. I don't think this was ever > written down and was defined before I joined. Also, there are no real > conventions related to changing the state. > > c) How does b) map to the definitions in > http://xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=MAINTAINERS;hb=HEAD > <http://xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=MAINTAINERS;hb=HEAD> > Perhaps we should simply add Experimental and Preview states to ./MAINTAINERS' S: specifier? > And then there are probably other areas where we may have similar mismatches Like x86 memory paging/sharing, where I'm sure the wiki page is what correctly reflects their states. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |