Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 08.06.15 at 11:27, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't know much about the hardware in the pool other than what can be
> gathered from the serial and dmesg logs.

Right - this is useful for learning details of an individual system, but
isn't really helpful when wanting to compare all system kinds that are
in the pool.

> From the serial log and this:
> 
> Jun  6 12:09:27.089020 (XEN) VMX: Supported advanced features:
> Jun  6 12:09:27.089052 (XEN)  - APIC MMIO access virtualisation
> Jun  6 12:09:27.097051 (XEN)  - APIC TPR shadow
> Jun  6 12:09:27.097088 (XEN)  - Extended Page Tables (EPT)
> Jun  6 12:09:27.097118 (XEN)  - Virtual-Processor Identifiers (VPID)
> Jun  6 12:09:27.105066 (XEN)  - Virtual NMI
> Jun  6 12:09:27.105100 (XEN)  - MSR direct-access bitmap
> Jun  6 12:09:27.105130 (XEN)  - Unrestricted Guest
> Jun  6 12:09:27.113269 (XEN)  - APIC Register Virtualization
> Jun  6 12:09:27.113290 (XEN)  - Virtual Interrupt Delivery
> Jun  6 12:09:27.113328 (XEN)  - Posted Interrupt Processing
> Jun  6 12:09:27.121180 (XEN) HVM: ASIDs enabled.
> Jun  6 12:09:27.121235 (XEN) HVM: VMX enabled
> Jun  6 12:09:27.121267 (XEN) HVM: Hardware Assisted Paging (HAP) detected
> Jun  6 12:09:27.129069 (XEN) HVM: HAP page sizes: 4kB, 2MB, 1GB
> 
> I guess they are pretty new?

Looks like so, yes.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel