Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/9] add xenalyze to staging

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 18:16 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/23/2015 09:24 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > Having xenalyze in the source tree makes it much easier to keep private
> > debug code in hypervisor and xenalyze in sync. It helped alot while
> > debugging the root cause for commit 
> > 607e8494c42397fb249191904066cace6ac9a880.
> > 
> > changes between v3 and v4:
> >  - install existing binaries in sbindir
> >  - install xenalyze in bindir
> > 
> > changes between v2 and v3:
> >  - move to tools/xentrace
> > 
> > changes between v1 and v2:
> >  - move to tools/xentrace/xenalyze
> >  - drop patch which touches sched_switch_process
> >  - add patch to remove argp_program_version
> >  - add patch to bump NR_CPUS
> > 
> > Olaf Hering (9):
> >   xentrace: install into sbin
> >   xenalyze: add to tools/xentrace/
> >   xenalyze: increase NR_CPUS to 256
> >   xenalyze: print newline after unknown hvm events
> >   xenalyze: include odd mmio states in default output
> >   xenalyze: handle TRC_TRACE_WRAP_BUFFER
> >   xenalyze: handle more events in sched_process
> >   xenalyze: remove traling whitespaces
> >   xenalyze: remove argp_program_version
> 
> Wei,
> 
> I think at this point everything except for patch 7 ("xenalyze: handle
> more events in sched_process") has been Ack-ed by both of us, and
> everyone else has had plenty of time to comment if they wish.  You
> should probably check in at least patches 1-6.  You could probably toss
> in 8-9 as well while you're at it.

Wei isn't a committer...

I found a build error on arm64 (see other mail), so I've only applied
the xentrace movement one.

Olaf, also there is a typo in #8 "traling" instead of "trailing".

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel