[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 for Xen 4.6 0/4] Enabling XL to set per-VCPU parameters of a domain for RTDS scheduler
>>> On 01.06.15 at 10:50, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/01/2015 09:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:36 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Most people put the Cc about the cut (---) which is fine too. It means >> the history ends up recording who was copied on the patch, which isn't >> necessarily a bad thing. > > Right -- I would have thought that was useless information cluttering up > the history, but I can see how it might actually be useful. Should I > start putting my CC's above the ---? :-) And should I stop dropping them even when above the --- for commit, which so far I've been doing as I don't consider this particularly useful information (other then e.g. who might have commented on a change without it being recorded in an Acked-by or Reviewed-by tag)? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |