Re: [Xen-devel] Plans for the SEDF scheduler

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:45 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
[...]
> >  2. keep the field 'physically', but return warnings and errors when it 
> >     is used. This is a change in behavior, so also not really stable
> >     (but, hey, the scheduler is going away, the behavior will change,
> >     one way or another!)
> 
> I think this is probably the best option.

Agreed.

[...]
> I think given that it's been "going away" for 9 years, we should
> probably just remove it

Agreed.

>  and put it back if people complain.  (And if
> they really really can't use RTDS instead.)

Nah ;-)

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel