Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 13/13] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 15.05.15 at 09:11, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2015/5/15 14:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 15.05.15 at 08:39, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 2015/5/15 14:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 15.05.15 at 08:11, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Even we may separate the
>>>>> low memory to construct memory_map.map[]...
>>>>
>>>> ???
>>>
>>> Sorry I just mean that the low memory is not represented with only one
>>> memory_map.map[] in some cases.
>>
>> That's correct.
>>
> 
> So just lets keep that original BUG_ON()?

In your previous reply you seemed to agree that the BUG_ON() is
becoming meaningless. Why do you now suggest to keep it then?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel