Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH Remus v3 3/3] libxc/restore: implement Remus checkpointed restore

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 14/05/2015 06:42, Yang Hongyang wrote:
>
>>> @@ -541,7 +618,27 @@ static int restore(struct xc_sr_context *ctx)
>>>       {
>>>           rc = read_record(ctx, &rec);
>>>           if ( rc )
>>> -            goto err;
>>> +        {
>>> +            if ( ctx->restore.buffer_all_records )
>>> +                goto err_buf;
>>
>> Please can we choose a label sufficiently different to "err".
>>
>> "resume_from_checkpoint" perhaps?
>
> I think "remus_failover" is better? If you don't have objections, I will
> use it as the label.

Fine by me.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel