[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen/vm_access: Support for memory-content hiding
- To: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 18:11:29 +0300
- Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx" <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, "Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx" <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sat, 09 May 2015 15:11:57 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 05/09/2015 11:33 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Ah yes, I missed the fact that you put it into a union with regs. I
> guess as long as it's the same size as regs it's fine. However, I
> think the union will have to be named.
Sure, I can name it. When I was working on it I was under the impression
that it's important to not disturb the API. I've since understood from
Andrew and Jan that that's not an issue.
Thanks,
Razvan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
