Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v8 6/7] Compose the main recipe of nested test job

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Pang, LongtaoX writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v8 6/7] Compose 
the main recipe of nested test job"):
> Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx]:
> > The arguments passed to ts-* in sg-run-job should _always_ be just a
> > bare indent. The ident=foo thing is a special case for standalone mode.
> > 
> Do you means that the parameter passed to ts-* in sg-run-job should _always_ 
> be just a bare ident?

Yes, that's what Ian means.

> If yes. I think it needs to pass l1's '$gn' which is not a bare ident to 
> 'ts-debian-hvm-install' for installing L1 guest VM, since the default '$gn 
> ||= 'debianhvm' if no other '$gn' was passed to this script, but for nested 
> job we expect a different '$gn' from 'debianhvm', such as 'nestedl1'. So it 
> need to pass 'host' and 'nestedl1' to  'ts-debian-hvm-install' script. 
> +    run-ts . = ts-debian-hvm-install + host + nestedl1

Indeed.

> For 'ts-nested-setup' script, it need to call 'ts_get_host_guest'
> which need two parameters 'host' and 'nestedl1' to get $l0 and $l1
> scope, so it also need to pass 'nestedl1' to this script.

Yes.

> For ' ts-guest-destroy', it also need two parameters of 'host' and 'nestedl1' 
> which is L1's '$gn'.

If you're intending to destroy the l1, then yes.  If you want to
destroy theh l2 then you need to pass `nestedl1' and whatever the L2
guest name/ident is.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel