[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: Add __GFP_DMA flag when xen_swiotlb_init gets free pages.
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 18:54 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > This should definitely be done only on ARM and ARM64, as on x86 PVH > > assumes the presence of an IOMMU. We need an ifdef. > > > > Also we need to figure out a way to try without GFP_DMA in case no ram > > under 4g is available at all, as some arm64 platforms don't have any. Of > > course in those cases we don't need to worry about devices and their dma > > masks. Maybe we could use memblock for that? > > It's pretty ugly, but I've not got any better ideas. > > It would perhaps be less ugly as a an arch-specific > get_me_a_swiotlb_region type function, with the bare __get_free_pages as > the generic fallback. We could do that, but even open code like this isn't too bad: it might be ugly but at least is very obvious. > > Something like: > > > > struct memblock_region *reg; > > gfp_t flags = __GFP_NOWARN; > > > > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) > > for_each_memblock(memory, reg) { > > unsigned long start = memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg); > > > > if (start < 4G) { > > flags |= __GFP_DMA; > > break; > > } > > } > > #endif > > > > [...] > > > > xen_io_tlb_start = (void *)__get_free_pages(flags, order); > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is also conceptually wrong since it doesn't matter where the pages > > > are in PFN space, but where they are in bus address (MFN) space (which > > > is what the subsequent hypercall is required to sort out). > > > > Actually on ARM dom0 is mapped 1:1, so it is the same thing. > > On a system with a fully functional SMMU dom0 may not be 1:1 mapped, but > I think that dom0 can still treat that as 1:1 mapped for these purposes, > since the SMMU will provide that illusion. > > Dumb question, and this might affect PVH too, if you have an IOMMU and a > device with a limited DMA range, I suppose you need to provide DMA > addresses in the <4G for the input to the IOMMU (i.e. PFN) and not the > output (i.e. MFN) space (since the device only sees PFNs). I think you mean "for the input to the device (PFN)", but I presume the same. > So even for x86 PVH isn't something required here to ensure that the > swiotlb has suitable pages under 4GB in PFN space too? > > (On ARM PFN==IPA and MFN==PA) I guess that is true. PVH people, any thoughts? > Second dumb question, on x86 PVH or ARM with an SMMU, would we even hit > the Xen swiotlb code, or would we want to arrange to go via the native > swiotlb paths? I initially thought the latter, but does e.g. grant > mappings still need some special handling? In both cases I think it would be simpler to just go through the normal swiotlb. FYI at the moment there is no knowledge about SMMUs availability on ARM. The code is still missing. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |