[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/8] raisin: Fix CentOS build



On 04/17/2015 11:14 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, George Dunlap wrote:
>> Add package dependencies for CentOS.  Also use PKGTYPE rather than
>> DISTRO to determine if we need rpm-build.
>>
>> I've tested this for xen but not for libvirt or grub.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  components/grub    |  5 +++++
>>  components/libvirt |  7 +++++++
>>  components/xen     | 10 ++++++++--
>>  lib/commands.sh    |  2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/components/grub b/components/grub
>> index 563a28c..af396d9 100644
>> --- a/components/grub
>> +++ b/components/grub
>> @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ function grub_check_package() {
>>      local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common"
>>      local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_common glibc-devel.i686"
>>  
>> +    local DEP_CentOS_common="make gcc tar automake autoconf sysconftool 
>> bison flex \
>> +                             glibc-devel"
>> +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_32="$DEP_CentOS_common"
>> +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_64="$DEP_CentOS_common glibc-devel.i686"
> 
> Given that they are the same as Fedora, I think it is OK to:
> 
> local DEP_CentOS_common="$DEP_Fedora_common"

In a previous version of the patch I had
"DEP_RedHat_{common,x86_32,x86_64}" (to mean things that were common
between all RH decendants, like Fedora or CentOS); but I couldn't make
the include stuff work properly.  Maybe just have a DEP_RedHat_common,
and allow the x86-specific ones to include it?

>>  
>>      if [[ $ARCH != "x86_64" && $ARCH != "x86_32" ]]
>>      then
>> diff --git a/components/libvirt b/components/libvirt
>> index 5853950..aef1bc8 100644
>> --- a/components/libvirt
>> +++ b/components/libvirt
>> @@ -18,6 +18,13 @@ function libvirt_check_package() {
>>      local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common"
>>      local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_common"
>>  
>> +    local DEP_CentOS_common="patch make gcc libtool autoconf gettext-devel  
>>    \
>> +                             python-devel libxslt yajl-devel libxml2-devel  
>>    \
>> +                             device-mapper-devel libpciaccess-devel         
>>    \
>> +                             libuuid-devel perl-XML-XPath"
>> +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_32="$DEP_CentOS_common"
>> +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_64="$DEP_CentOS_common"
> 
> Same here, also please test the libvirt build: the list of dependencies
> is pretty big, I worry that one of them might actually differ from Fedora

If there were something missing, it wouldn't be a regression (since
libvirt doesn't apply without this patch either).  Testing libvirt is on
my to-do list, but if I don't get to it, would you mind checking it in
as-is (once the series is in better shape)?  I'll definitely get libvirt
working before the release.

 -George


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.