Re: [Xen-devel] make c-stubdom returns No rule to make target `mini-os-x86_64-c'

[Antti Kantee <pooka@xxxxxx>]

On 16/04/15 10:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
> But I think we can safely(?) say that work done on rumpkernel will be a
> more worthwhile investment, while work on stubdom would be more of a
> sunk cost...
I can't speak for "stubdom", but I sure hope that work done on rump 
kernels is a worthwhile investment ;)
One thing I'd like to note, though.  While we certainly welcome users 
and contributors already, until someone manages to get around to 
whacking the build system enough to support an "install toolchain" 
feature, it is unclear which bits in the build directory are meant to 
remain stable and which ones just happened to be there at $t.  If 
someone wants to build systems and wants to depend on feature $x 
remaining to be present, for now it's better to ask on the list.
http://wiki.rumpkernel.org/Info:-Community

  - antti

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel