[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/9] raisin: add a component to build qemu_traditional
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 18:42 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, George Dunlap wrote: > > > On 04/15/2015 05:11 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 16:49 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > >>>>> It would be nice if there was a --wtih-system-qemu-trad= option, but > > > >>>>> that has been looked upon unfavourably by the maintainers. > > > >>>> Thanks for feedback!! > > > >>>> I think Raisin needs something like --with-system-qemu-trad=, so if > > > >>>> Xen > > > >>>> doesn't provide it, we'll have to carry a patch in Raisin to do it. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Do you have a link to the discussion or previously rejected patch? > > > >>> > > > >>> I am not sure that there was ever a patch - it may have been a > > > >>> discussion I had with ijc in person. > > > >> > > > >> Possibly I can't remember myself either. > > > >> > > > >>> I would be +1 for a --with-system-qemu-trad= option to mirror the > > > >>> --with-system-qemu, especially as I am now not the only advocate of > > > >>> one. > > > >> > > > >> In a pre-raisin world I suppose I thought it didn't make too much sense > > > >> to go through that churn if we weren't going to stop _all_ > > > >> cloning/downloading from within xen.git. > > > >> > > > >> Personally I would have considered qemu-trad very much part of the long > > > >> tail wrt moving things out of xen.git, but anyway. > > > >> > > > >> I'd like to see raisin used/supported by osstest before we start > > > >> accepting thoe sorts of xen.git patches being suggested here. > > > > > > > > I think we'll have to carry those patches in Raisin anyway, otherwise > > > > how are we supposed to be able to build xen 4.5? I don't think is > > > > reasonable to be able to build only 4.6 onward. > > > > > > Why isn't that reasonable? It's a completely new tool. > > > > > > Speaking of which -- are we going to try to make any version of raisin > > > build any random version of Xen, or are we going to have "releases" of > > > raisin (and subsequent branches and tags in the raisin.git tree) for > > > each version we want to support? > > > > If we cannot do any better, we can resort to that, but as a user I like > > the fact that I can use raisin to build any relatively modern xen > > version by simply specifying a tag. > > > > We can figure out a way to detect whether we need to patch Xen and only > > in that case do it. > > When Raisin is building Xen 4.5 or earlier it should just let xen.git > take care of cloning and building qemu-trad (and anything else which is > in xen 4.5 by default). Thinking about patching xen 4.5 on the fly for > this is just madness. But then the external qemu-traditional build would silently overwrite the qemu-traditional binary produced by xen-unstable or fail during installation. Both options are not very nice. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |