[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 6/6] Qemu-Xen-vTPM: Add a parameter indicating whether the command that was a selftest
On 04/12/2015 10:15 PM, Xu, Quan wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Berger [mailto:stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 4:50 AM To: Xu, Quan; stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; eblake@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx; qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx; wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx; dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] Qemu-Xen-vTPM: Add a parameter indicating whether the command that was a selftest On 04/10/2015 02:59 AM, Quan Xu wrote:and whether it completed successfully. Move tpm_passthrough_is_selftest() into tpm_util.c and rename it totpm_util_is_selftest().Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> --- hw/tpm/Makefile.objs | 2 +- hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c | 13 +---------- hw/tpm/tpm_util.c | 50++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++hw/tpm/tpm_xenstubdoms.c | 36+++++++++++++++++++++++------include/sysemu/tpm_backend_int.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) create mode 100644 hw/tpm/tpm_util.c diff --git a/hw/tpm/Makefile.objs b/hw/tpm/Makefile.objs index 190e776..cba961c 100644 --- a/hw/tpm/Makefile.objs +++ b/hw/tpm/Makefile.objs @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -common-obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS) += tpm_tis.o +common-obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS) += tpm_tis.o tpm_util.o common-obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_PASSTHROUGH) += tpm_passthrough.o common-obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_XENSTUBDOMS) += tpm_xenstubdoms.o xen_vtpm_frontend.o diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c index 2a45071..ff08e15 100644 --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c @@ -112,17 +112,6 @@ static void tpm_write_fatal_error_response(uint8_t*out, uint32_t out_len)} } -static bool tpm_passthrough_is_selftest(const uint8_t *in, uint32_t in_len) -{ - struct tpm_req_hdr *hdr = (struct tpm_req_hdr *)in; - - if (in_len >= sizeof(*hdr)) { - return (be32_to_cpu(hdr->ordinal) == TPM_ORD_ContinueSelfTest); - } - - return false; -} - static int tpm_passthrough_unix_tx_bufs(TPMPassthruState *tpm_pt, const uint8_t *in, uint32_tin_len,uint8_t *out, uint32_t out_len, @@ -136,7 +125,7 @@ static inttpm_passthrough_unix_tx_bufs(TPMPassthruState *tpm_pt,tpm_pt->tpm_executing = true; *selftest_done = false; - is_selftest = tpm_passthrough_is_selftest(in, in_len); + is_selftest = tpm_util_is_selftest(in, in_len); ret = tpm_passthrough_unix_write(tpm_pt->tpm_fd, in, in_len); if (ret != in_len) { diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_util.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_util.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8566781 --- /dev/null +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_util.c @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +/* + * TPM util functions + * + * * Copyright (c) 2015 Intel Corporation + * Authors: + * Quan Xu <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> + * + * Copyright (c) 2010 - 2013 IBM Corporation + * Authors: + * Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> + * + * Copyright (C) 2011 IAIK, Graz University of Technology + * Author: Andreas NiederlI don't think that for this particular function this Copyright applies.Thanks Stefan. Could I just delete "Copyright (C) 2011 IAIK.."? share me more specific copyright, if I am not correct. For this single function that's going to land in tpm_util.c for now we don't need this Copyright. This patch per se looks good, but some of your modifications will not compile until this patch is applied, due to the missing selftest_done parameter. So you should merge this patch into the 3rd patch in this series.Okay, I will do it in next version. If the other patches are good, I can send out v6 soon. Thanks. Stefan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |