[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 07/15] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
> From: Wu, Feng > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 8:32 PM > > This patch adds an API which is used to update the IRTE > for posted-interrupt when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c | 83 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h | 3 ++ > xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h | 2 + > 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c > b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c > index 0333686..f44e74d 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c > @@ -898,3 +898,86 @@ void iommu_disable_x2apic_IR(void) > for_each_drhd_unit ( drhd ) > disable_qinval(drhd->iommu); > } > + > +/* > + * This function is used to update the IRTE for posted-interrupt > + * when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information > + */ > +int pi_update_irte(struct vcpu *v, struct pirq *pirq, uint32_t gvec ) > +{ > + struct irq_desc *desc; > + struct msi_desc *msi_desc; > + int remap_index, rc = -1; > + struct pci_dev *pci_dev; > + struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd; > + struct iommu *iommu; > + struct ir_ctrl *ir_ctrl; > + struct iremap_entry *iremap_entries = NULL, *p = NULL; > + struct iremap_entry new_ire; > + struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc; > + unsigned long flags; > + > + desc = pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc(pirq, NULL); > + if ( !desc ) > + return -1; > + > + msi_desc = desc->msi_desc; > + if ( !msi_desc ) > + goto unlock_out; > + > + remap_index = msi_desc->remap_index; > + pci_dev = msi_desc->dev; > + if ( !pci_dev ) > + goto unlock_out; > + > + drhd = acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit(pci_dev); > + if (!drhd) > + { > + dprintk(XENLOG_INFO VTDPREFIX, "failed to get drhd!\n"); > + goto unlock_out; > + } > + > + iommu = drhd->iommu; > + ir_ctrl = iommu_ir_ctrl(iommu); > + if ( !ir_ctrl ) > + { > + dprintk(XENLOG_INFO VTDPREFIX, "failed to get ir_ctrl!\n"); > + goto unlock_out; > + } > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ir_ctrl->iremap_lock, flags); > + > + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, > iremap_entries, p); > + > + memcpy(&new_ire, p, sizeof(struct iremap_entry)); > + > + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry */ > + new_ire.lo_intpost.urg = 0; > + new_ire.lo_intpost.vector = gvec; > + new_ire.lo_intpost.pda_l = (((u64)virt_to_maddr(pi_desc)) >> > + (32 - PDA_LOW_BIT)) & ~(-1UL << > PDA_LOW_BIT); > + new_ire.hi_intpost.pda_h = (((u64)virt_to_maddr(pi_desc)) >> 32) & > + ~(-1UL << PDA_HIGH_BIT); > + > + new_ire.lo_intpost.res_1 = 0; > + new_ire.lo_intpost.res_2 = 0; > + new_ire.lo_intpost.res_3 = 0; > + new_ire.hi_intpost.res_1 = 0; > + > + new_ire.lo_intpost.im = 1; > + Is above code for creating a new entry or updating an existing entry? suppose two purposes would require different steps but here I didn't see a difference... or if you mean every update is equal to what's required for creating a new one, better add a comment for that. Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |