|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 07:56 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.03.15 at 19:18, <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
> > @@ -1936,12 +1936,8 @@ static void init_pcpu(const struct scheduler *ops,
> > int cpu)
> > }
> >
> > /* Figure out which runqueue to put it in */
> > - rqi = 0;
> > -
> > - /* Figure out which runqueue to put it in */
> > - /* NB: cpu 0 doesn't get a STARTING callback, so we hard-code it to
> > runqueue 0. */
> > - if ( cpu == 0 )
> > - rqi = 0;
> > + if ( system_state == SYS_STATE_boot )
>
> ... I'd suggest using <= SYS_STATE_boot or < SYS_STATE_smp_boot.
>
Ok.
> > @@ -1986,9 +1982,13 @@ static void init_pcpu(const struct scheduler *ops,
> > int cpu)
> > static void *
> > csched2_alloc_pdata(const struct scheduler *ops, int cpu)
> > {
> > - /* Check to see if the cpu is online yet */
> > - /* Note: cpu 0 doesn't get a STARTING callback */
> > - if ( cpu == 0 || cpu_to_socket(cpu) >= 0 )
> > + /*
> > + * Actual initialization is deferred to when the pCPU will be
> > + * online, via a STARTING callback. The only exception is
> > + * the boot cpu, which does not get such a notification, and
> > + * hence needs to be taken care of here.
> > + */
> > + if ( system_state == SYS_STATE_boot )
> > init_pcpu(ops, cpu);
>
> Same here, plus the new condition at the first glance isn't matching
> the old one, but perhaps that's intentional.
>
It is intentional, and that is why we're changing it! :-) Let me try to
explain:
The idea, in both old and new code, is to call init_pcpu() either:
a) on the boot cpu, during boot
b) on non-boot cpu, *only* if they are online.
The issue is that, for assessing b), it checks whether
cpu_to_socket(cpu) returns >=0 and, if it does, it assumes the cpu is
online. That is not true, as cpu_data.phys_proc_id (which is what
cpu_to_socket() go reading) is 0 even before any onlining and topolog
identification has happened (it's a global).
Therefore, all the pcpus are initialized right away, and all are
assigned to runqueue 0, as returned by cpu_to_socket() at this stage,
which is clearly wrong.
In fact, this is the reason why, previous versions of this took the
approach of initializing things such as cpu_to_socket() returned -1
before topology identification.
In the new version, as you suggested, I'm using system_state to figure
out whether we are dealing with the boot cpu, and that's it. :-)
Hope this clarifies things... If yes, I'll make sure to put a similar
explanation in the changelog, when sending the patch officially.
Regards,
Dario
Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |