Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] Add flag to start info regarding virtual mapped p2m list

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 07:43 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 07:56 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > In order to indicate the Xen tools capability to support the virtual
> > mapped linear p2m list instead the 3 level mfn tree add a flag to the
> > start_info page.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Ping?

I'm still waiting for a reply to <1425469278.25940.144.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>

Ian.

> 
> > ---
> >   xen/include/public/xen.h | 10 ++++++----
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/include/public/xen.h b/xen/include/public/xen.h
> > index 3703c39..66c09a3 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/public/xen.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/public/xen.h
> > @@ -773,10 +773,12 @@ typedef struct start_info start_info_t;
> >   #endif /* XEN_HAVE_PV_GUEST_ENTRY */
> >
> >   /* These flags are passed in the 'flags' field of start_info_t. */
> > -#define SIF_PRIVILEGED    (1<<0)  /* Is the domain privileged? */
> > -#define SIF_INITDOMAIN    (1<<1)  /* Is this the initial control domain? */
> > -#define SIF_MULTIBOOT_MOD (1<<2)  /* Is mod_start a multiboot module? */
> > -#define SIF_MOD_START_PFN (1<<3)  /* Is mod_start a PFN? */
> > +#define SIF_PRIVILEGED      (1<<0)  /* Is the domain privileged? */
> > +#define SIF_INITDOMAIN      (1<<1)  /* Is this the initial control domain? 
> > */
> > +#define SIF_MULTIBOOT_MOD   (1<<2)  /* Is mod_start a multiboot module? */
> > +#define SIF_MOD_START_PFN   (1<<3)  /* Is mod_start a PFN? */
> > +#define SIF_VIRT_P2M_4TOOLS (1<<4)  /* Do Xen tools understand a virt. 
> > mapped */
> > +                                    /* P->M making the 3 level tree 
> > obsolete? */
> >   #define SIF_PM_MASK       (0xFF<<8) /* reserve 1 byte for xen-pm options 
> > */
> >
> >   /*
> >
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel