|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] iommu VT-d: separate rmrr addition function
----- elena.ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:29:54AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 09.03.15 at 15:42, <elena.ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
> > > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
> > > @@ -567,6 +567,66 @@ out:
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +int register_one_rmrr(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru)
> >
> > static - I don't see why the command line processing in patch 2
> can't
> > be put in this file.
>
> I wanted to keep it close to iommu command line parser in iommu.c.
> Andrew mentioned that the parser should be defined as custom_param.
> Did you mean that as well and that it should be moved to dmar.c?
Never mind, I saw the answer.
>
> >
> > > +{
> > > + u8 b, d, f;
> > > + bool_t ignore = 0;
> > > + unsigned int i = 0;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > + /* Skip checking if segment is not accessible yet. */
> > > + if ( !pci_known_segment(rmrru->segment) )
> > > + i = UINT_MAX;
> > > +
> > > + for ( ; i < rmrru->scope.devices_cnt; i++ )
> > > + {
> > > + b = PCI_BUS(rmrru->scope.devices[i]);
> > > + d = PCI_SLOT(rmrru->scope.devices[i]);
> > > + f = PCI_FUNC(rmrru->scope.devices[i]);
> >
> > Please make this the declarations (with initializers) of these
> variables;
> > they don't appear to be used outside this scope.
> >
> > > +
> > > + if ( pci_device_detect(rmrru->segment, b, d, f) == 0 )
> > > + {
> > > + dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> > > + " Non-existent device (%04x:%02x:%02x.%u) is
> reported"
> > > + " in RMRR (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx64")'s
> scope!\n",
> > > + rmrru->segment, b, d, f,
> > > + rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
> > > + ignore = 1;
> > > + }
> > > + else
> > > + {
> > > + ignore = 0;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if ( ignore )
> > > + {
> > > + dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> > > + " Ignore the RMRR (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx64") due to "
> > > + "devices under its scope are not PCI
> discoverable!\n",
> > > + rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
> > > + ret = -EFAULT;
> > > + }
> > > + else if ( rmrru->base_address > rmrru->end_address )
> > > + {
> > > + dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> > > + " The RMRR (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx64") is incorrect!\n",
> > > + rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
> > > + ret = -EFAULT;
> > > + }
> > > + else
> > > + {
> > > + if ( iommu_verbose )
> > > + dprintk(VTDPREFIX,
> > > + " RMRR region: base_addr %"PRIx64
> > > + " end_address %"PRIx64"\n",
> > > + rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
> > > + acpi_register_rmrr_unit(rmrru);
> > > + }
> > > + return ret;
> >
> > Blank line before return please.
> >
> > > @@ -618,66 +678,14 @@ acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header
> *header)
> > > &rmrru->scope, RMRR_TYPE,
> rmrr->segment);
> > >
> > > if ( ret || (rmrru->scope.devices_cnt == 0) )
> > > - xfree(rmrru);
> > > - else
> > > {
> > > - u8 b, d, f;
> > > - bool_t ignore = 0;
> > > - unsigned int i = 0;
> > > -
> > > - /* Skip checking if segment is not accessible yet. */
> > > - if ( !pci_known_segment(rmrr->segment) )
> > > - i = UINT_MAX;
> > > -
> > > - for ( ; i < rmrru->scope.devices_cnt; i++ )
> > > - {
> > > - b = PCI_BUS(rmrru->scope.devices[i]);
> > > - d = PCI_SLOT(rmrru->scope.devices[i]);
> > > - f = PCI_FUNC(rmrru->scope.devices[i]);
> > > -
> > > - if ( pci_device_detect(rmrr->segment, b, d, f) == 0
> )
> > > - {
> > > - dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> > > - " Non-existent device (%04x:%02x:%02x.%u)
> is reported"
> > > - " in RMRR (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx64")'s
> scope!\n",
> > > - rmrr->segment, b, d, f,
> > > - rmrru->base_address,
> rmrru->end_address);
> > > - ignore = 1;
> > > - }
> > > - else
> > > - {
> > > - ignore = 0;
> > > - break;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if ( ignore )
> > > - {
> > > - dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> > > - " Ignore the RMRR (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx64") due to
> "
> > > - "devices under its scope are not PCI
> discoverable!\n",
> > > - rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
> > > - xfree(rmrru);
> > > - }
> > > - else if ( base_addr > end_addr )
> > > - {
> > > - dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> > > - " The RMRR (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx64") is
> incorrect!\n",
> > > - rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
> > > - xfree(rmrru);
> > > - ret = -EFAULT;
> > > - }
> > > - else
> > > - {
> > > - if ( iommu_verbose )
> > > - dprintk(VTDPREFIX,
> > > - " RMRR region: base_addr %"PRIx64
> > > - " end_address %"PRIx64"\n",
> > > - rmrru->base_address,
> rmrru->end_address);
> > > - acpi_register_rmrr_unit(rmrru);
> > > - }
> > > + xfree(rmrru);
> > > + return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + ret = register_one_rmrr(rmrru);
> > > + if ( ret )
> > > + xfree(rmrru);
> > > return ret;
> >
> > Please try to make this a single xfree() and a single return (with
> > again a blank line preceding it).
>
> Got it, I will make changes you mentioned.
> >
> > Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |