Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 33516: regressions - FAIL [and 2 more messages]

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 19.01.15 at 12:40, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 33516: 
> regressions - 
> FAIL"):
>> >  test-amd64-i386-pair   17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 
>> > 33292
>> 
>> this continues to suffer from the swiotlb issue, and prevents the push
>> from happening that would allow RC1s to be cut for 4.3 and 4.4. Is
>> there anything we can do here (like disabling the host for certain
>> tests, older kernels, ...)?
> 
> I'm reluctant to disable the test or explicitly mark it as not
> blocking.  But it does appear that there is not enough effort
> available for fixing this problem.
> 
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 33476: tolerable 
> FAIL 
> - PUSHED"):
>> Or, continuing from the 4.4 test reply just sent, does that tree simply
>> need a one time force push so that the test moves into the "not
>> blocking" category like it is in here (and I think also on 4.3)? Of
>> course that's not ideal, but getting that swiotlb issue under control
>> appears to be a rather time consuming thing...
> 
> Indeed, I think a force push is the right answer.
> 
> So, just to confirm, what I will do (if you give your permission) is
> to force push 30f10d4d2b102bd7184b84c9cc3d2246f060706a to stable-4.4.

Yes, please.

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel