[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the ABI

>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:57, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the 
> ABI"):
>> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header.
>> > This is the main reason for the submission being RFC. While we don't
>> > currently use these error codes, I'm not sure if we should leave all
>> > or some of them out for the time being.
>> I say lets omit any we don't use for now.
> Is it possible that anyone is using the existing header file where
> these values were defined ?  If so their code might say
>   case ELOOP:
> which would not compile when they switched to the new header.

The existing header is a hypervisor private one. Any code outside
the hypervisor using it imo deserves to get broken.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.