[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the ABI
On 13/01/15 16:21, Jan Beulich wrote: > Now that we have two cases where patches against hvmloader got > submitted needing to include the hypervisor's errno.h (for the host's > system header not necessarily reflecting the correct numbers), take > this as a strong sign that we need to make the error return values part > of the hypervisor ABI (which de-fact they've always been). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > --- > There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header. > This is the main reason for the submission being RFC. While we don't > currently use these error codes, I'm not sure if we should leave all > or some of them out for the time being. I would suggest that we drop any error codes not in use. We can always add them back in in the future if they are needed. I would also suggest that we note the heritage, being taken from Linux 2.$mumble, which will act as a guide for introducing new codes in the future. Finally, I would suggest that we assign the Xen meaning (e.g. EACCES = bad tool interface) rather than Linux meanings. > > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ > #define __ARM_PAGE_H__ > > #include <xen/config.h> > -#include <xen/errno.h> > #include <public/xen.h> > #include <asm/processor.h> > > @@ -83,6 +82,7 @@ > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > +#include <xen/errno.h> > #include <xen/types.h> > #include <xen/lib.h> > > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/multicall.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/multicall.h > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ > " callq *%%rax; " \ > "1: movq %%rax,%c4(%0)\n" \ > ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \ > - "2: movq $-"STR(ENOSYS)",%%rax\n" \ > + "2: movq %5,%%rax\n" \ > " jmp 1b\n" \ > ".previous\n" \ > : \ > @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ > "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), op)), \ > "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), args)), \ > "i" (sizeof(*(_call)->args)), \ > - "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)) \ > + "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)), \ > + "i" (-ENOSYS) \ > /* all the caller-saves registers */ \ > : "rax", "rcx", "rdx", "rsi", "rdi", \ > "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11" ); \ > @@ -54,7 +55,7 @@ > " callq *%%rax; " \ > "1: movl %%eax,%c4(%0)\n" \ > ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \ > - "2: movl $-"STR(ENOSYS)",%%eax\n" \ > + "2: movl %5,%%eax\n" \ > " jmp 1b\n" \ > ".previous\n" \ > : \ > @@ -62,7 +63,8 @@ > "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), op)), \ > "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), args)), \ > "i" (sizeof(*(_call)->args)), \ > - "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)) \ > + "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)), \ > + "i" (-ENOSYS) \ > /* all the caller-saves registers */ \ > : "rax", "rcx", "rdx", "rsi", "rdi", \ > "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11" ) \ > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/include/public/errno.h > @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ > +#ifndef __XEN_PUBLIC_ERRNO_H__ > + > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > + > +#define XEN_ERRNO(name, value) XEN_##name = value, > +enum xen_errno { > + > +#else /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ > + > +#define XEN_ERRNO(name, value) .equ XEN_##name, value > + > +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > + > +/* ` enum neg_errnoval { [ -Efoo for each Efoo in the list below ] } */ > +/* ` enum errnoval { */ > + > +#endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_ERRNO_H__ */ > + > +#ifdef XEN_ERRNO > + > +XEN_ERRNO(EPERM, 1) /* Operation not permitted */ > +XEN_ERRNO(ENOENT, 2) /* No such file or directory */ > +XEN_ERRNO(ESRCH, 3) /* No such process */ > +#ifdef __XEN__ > +XEN_ERRNO(EINTR, 4) /* Interrupted system call */ > +#endif Why is EINTR (and ERESTART lower) hidden from non-xen consumers but still in the public api? Would it not be better to keep these in xen/errno.h rather than public/errno.h ? ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |