|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the ABI
On 13/01/15 16:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Now that we have two cases where patches against hvmloader got
> submitted needing to include the hypervisor's errno.h (for the host's
> system header not necessarily reflecting the correct numbers), take
> this as a strong sign that we need to make the error return values part
> of the hypervisor ABI (which de-fact they've always been).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header.
> This is the main reason for the submission being RFC. While we don't
> currently use these error codes, I'm not sure if we should leave all
> or some of them out for the time being.
I would suggest that we drop any error codes not in use. We can always
add them back in in the future if they are needed.
I would also suggest that we note the heritage, being taken from Linux
2.$mumble, which will act as a guide for introducing new codes in the
future.
Finally, I would suggest that we assign the Xen meaning (e.g. EACCES =
bad tool interface) rather than Linux meanings.
>
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> #define __ARM_PAGE_H__
>
> #include <xen/config.h>
> -#include <xen/errno.h>
> #include <public/xen.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
>
> @@ -83,6 +82,7 @@
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> +#include <xen/errno.h>
> #include <xen/types.h>
> #include <xen/lib.h>
>
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/multicall.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/multicall.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> " callq *%%rax; " \
> "1: movq %%rax,%c4(%0)\n" \
> ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
> - "2: movq $-"STR(ENOSYS)",%%rax\n" \
> + "2: movq %5,%%rax\n" \
> " jmp 1b\n" \
> ".previous\n" \
> : \
> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
> "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), op)), \
> "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), args)), \
> "i" (sizeof(*(_call)->args)), \
> - "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)) \
> + "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)), \
> + "i" (-ENOSYS) \
> /* all the caller-saves registers */ \
> : "rax", "rcx", "rdx", "rsi", "rdi", \
> "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11" ); \
> @@ -54,7 +55,7 @@
> " callq *%%rax; " \
> "1: movl %%eax,%c4(%0)\n" \
> ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
> - "2: movl $-"STR(ENOSYS)",%%eax\n" \
> + "2: movl %5,%%eax\n" \
> " jmp 1b\n" \
> ".previous\n" \
> : \
> @@ -62,7 +63,8 @@
> "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), op)), \
> "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), args)), \
> "i" (sizeof(*(_call)->args)), \
> - "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)) \
> + "i" (offsetof(__typeof__(*_call), result)), \
> + "i" (-ENOSYS) \
> /* all the caller-saves registers */ \
> : "rax", "rcx", "rdx", "rsi", "rdi", \
> "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11" ) \
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/include/public/errno.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> +#ifndef __XEN_PUBLIC_ERRNO_H__
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#define XEN_ERRNO(name, value) XEN_##name = value,
> +enum xen_errno {
> +
> +#else /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#define XEN_ERRNO(name, value) .equ XEN_##name, value
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +/* ` enum neg_errnoval { [ -Efoo for each Efoo in the list below ] } */
> +/* ` enum errnoval { */
> +
> +#endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_ERRNO_H__ */
> +
> +#ifdef XEN_ERRNO
> +
> +XEN_ERRNO(EPERM, 1) /* Operation not permitted */
> +XEN_ERRNO(ENOENT, 2) /* No such file or directory */
> +XEN_ERRNO(ESRCH, 3) /* No such process */
> +#ifdef __XEN__
> +XEN_ERRNO(EINTR, 4) /* Interrupted system call */
> +#endif
Why is EINTR (and ERESTART lower) hidden from non-xen consumers but
still in the public api? Would it not be better to keep these in
xen/errno.h rather than public/errno.h ?
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |