[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups

To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:30:01 +0100
Cc: kvm list <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, glommer@xxxxxxxxx, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:30:27 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>


On 23/12/2014 09:16, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Any thoughts as to whether it should be tagged for stable?  I haven't
> looked closely enough at the old pvclock code or the generated code to
> have much of an opinion there.  It'll be a big speedup for non-pvclock
> users at least.

Yes, please.

Paolo

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups
  - From: Andy Lutomirski

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 32585: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] enable Memory Bandwidth Monitoring (MBM) for VMs
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 32581: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.