[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xmalloc: add support for checking the pool integrity
On 17/12/14 10:24, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 17/12/2014 10:11, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 16/12/14 23:37, Julien Grall wrote: >> Introducing a new bugframe is precicely what I meant by "this doesn't >> look hard". x86 currently has one more bugframe than arm, being >> BUGFRAME_run_fn. > > And how do you pass the pointer of the function? As I said, ARM lacks > of %c because of compiler issue. > > I'm out of idea on how to do simply on ARM. Let me know if you have a > good solution. > > What I meant with introduce a new bug frame adding BUGFRAM_dump_stack. > > Regards, > I don't know about good, but stringly typing the function pointer and stashing it in the same way as the assert message would work. (I can see now why you suggested BUGFRAME_dump_stack, but it would be nice to find a more generic alternative if possible.) ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |