[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] lock down hypercall continuation encoding masks

At 11:31 +0000 on 05 Dec (1417775465), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
> of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A guest
> suspended for migration in the middle of a continuation would fail to
> work if resumed on a hypervisor using a different value. Hence add
> respective comments to their definitions.
> Additionally, to help future extensibility as well as in the spirit of
> reducing undefined behavior as much as possible, refuse hypercalls made
> with the respective bits non-zero when the respective sub-ops don't
> make use of those bits.
> Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.