[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] PVH cleanups after 4.5
At 09:20 +0000 on 05 Dec (1417767654), Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 04.12.14 at 18:25, <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Potential feature flags, based on whiteboard notes at the session. > > Things that are 'Yes' in both columns might not need actual flags :) > > > > 'HVM' 'PVH' > > 64bit hypercalls Yes Yes > > 32bit hypercalls Yes No > > Iiuc the lack of support of 32-bit hypercalls is simply because PVH > guests aren't expected to use them as being always 64-bit right > now. I.e. I can't really see why we couldn't just enable them once > the 64-bit hypercall tables got combined, in which case we wouldn't > need a feature flag here either. Agreed -- I think the same will apply to a few other things, like shadow pagetables and some of the other MM tricks. Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |