[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 for-4.6] libxl_set_memory_target: retain the same maxmem offset on top of the current target
On 12/02/14 09:59, Don Slutz wrote: On 12/02/14 09:26, Stefano Stabellini wrote:On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Don Slutz wrote:On 12/02/14 06:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:In libxl_set_memory_target when setting the new maxmem, retain the sameoffset on top of the current target. The offset includes memory allocated by QEMU for rom files. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini<stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v2: - call libxl_domain_info instead of libxl_dominfo_init; - call libxl_domain_info before retry_transaction. diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c index de23fec..569a32a 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c@@ -4694,6 +4694,9 @@ int libxl_set_memory_target(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_tdomid, char *uuid; xs_transaction_t t; + if (libxl_domain_info(ctx, &ptr, domid) < 0) + goto out_no_transaction; + retry_transaction: t = xs_transaction_start(ctx->xsh); @@ -4767,10 +4770,9 @@ retry_transaction: "%s/memory/videoram", dompath)); videoram = videoram_s ? atoi(videoram_s) : 0; - if (enforce) { - memorykb = new_target_memkb; - rc = xc_domain_setmaxmem(ctx->xch, domid, memorykb + - LIBXL_MAXMEM_CONSTANT); + if (enforce && new_target_memkb > 0) {+ memorykb = ptr.max_memkb - current_target_memkb + new_target_memkb; My testing shows that this should be: memorykb = ptr.max_memkb - (current_target_memkb + videoram) + new_target_memkb; As far as I can tell the reason for this is that memory/target (aka current_target_memkb) was set based on: new_target_memkb -= videoram; -Don Slutz + rc = xc_domain_setmaxmem(ctx->xch, domid, memorykb); if (rc != 0) { LIBXL__LOG_ERRNO(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR, "xc_domain_setmaxmem domid=%d memkb=%d failed "You need to remove LIBXL_MAXMEM_CONSTANT here also.I don't think so: LIBXL_MAXMEM_CONSTANT is supposed to be a safety buffer and we should keep it as is across libxl_set_memory_target calls. Arguably LIBXL_MAXMEM_CONSTANT could be removed entirely with the proposed QEMU changes but that is a separate matter.I was talking about the line:"rc=%d\n", domid, memorykb + LIBXL_MAXMEM_CONSTANT, rc);(which is missing from the diff but is part of the LIBXL__LOG_ERRNO call). Theerror message no longer matches what xc_domain_setmaxmem() was called with. -Don Slutz@@ -4800,8 +4802,6 @@ retry_transaction: goto out; } - libxl_dominfo_init(&ptr); - xcinfo2xlinfo(ctx, &info, &ptr); uuid = libxl__uuid2string(gc, ptr.uuid);libxl__xs_write(gc, t, libxl__sprintf(gc, "/vm/%s/memory", uuid),"%"PRIu32, new_target_memkb / 1024); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |