[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] vtpmmgr bug: fails to start if locality!=0
On 11/14/2014 09:22 AM, Emil Condrea wrote:
I modified linux kernel tpm_tis driver to try to start with locality 2. I
did some logging and after taking a look with dmesg it seems that the IO
pages for other localities are full with 1.
in tpm_tis_init:
for(i=0;i<5;i++){
release_locality(chip,i,1);
}
...
wait_startup(chip,2);
request_locality(chip,2)
...
TPM_RID(2);//FF
TPM_RID(0);//64
Would this mean that Atmel disabled other localities after manufacturing? I
tried to define a NVRAM index at F200 but I have the same results.
My best guess is that locality 2 is disabled until a DRTM launch is
done. Since your system does not support a DRTM launch, this guess
cannot easily be tested.
I see what you mean about changing the DeepQuote behaviour in order to
provide evidence of the VM launch but I am not sure that I understand what
is the type of extraInfoFlags and what should it contain. Will the UUIDs
and vTPM measurements be stored in extraInfoFlags?
extraInfoFlags would be a bitmask defined in a specification, like:
1 - vTPM UUID present
2 - vTPM Group UUID present
4 - vTPM kernel measurement present
8 - vTPM command line argument measurement present
16 - Group configuration hash present
32 - Group master public key hash present
...
This allows the later fields to be unambiguously decoded by a verifier
without requiring the disclosure of fields that are not needed (for
example, the UUIDs could be omitted for privacy reasons).
If we take this as a solution for systems that do not support DRTM lanch,
they will still be forced to use locality 0 if any other is disabled and
the TPM might return busy if other commands are currently running.
Thanks.
Emil Condrea
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 11/07/2014 05:40 AM, Emil Condrea wrote:
My system does not support DRTM so I can not test this. I am interested in
contributing to vtpm and making this to work without DRTM, can you give me
more details about PCRs that need to be implemented using an alternate
manner? When someone wants to use other locality than 0 it will run all
commands with PCRs disabled? Since the vtpmmgr is tying domU to hardware
TPM, deactivating PCRs will result that all commands issued by domU will
not use PCRs anymore, right?
The PCRs seen by the domU are emulated by the vTPM, and the vTPM Manager
has no information on any of their values or updates. Deep quotes may
include a hash of the vTPM's PCR values, but the vTPM Manager is only
asserting that the hash was given by the vTPM.
Where should the new layer of PCR values stored? NVRAM ?
They will be stored in the vtpmmgr domain's RAM; in fact, they are already
stored there (they just need to be used more directly).
The PCRs in question are PCR 20-23, used by the vTPM Manager to store
information about the vTPM making a deep quote request. In order to
support more than one vTPM, the values of these PCRs need to be reset when
a different client connects. However, the reset operation for PCR 20-22 is
limited to locality 2.
An alternative to this is to embed this information in the externData
field that is signed by the quote operation. This requires a bit more work
to provide the same flexibility that the PCRs provided, but it can be made
equivalently secure.
A deep quote request currently contains a PCR mask and a requestData value
(20 bytes) from the vTPM. On a deep quote request, the vTPM Manager:
1. Reset PCR 20-23
2. Extend information about the requesting vTPM to PCR 20-23
- Different information is extended into each PCR
- Some clients want all information, some only want selected PCRs
3. Perform a Quote with externData=requestData on the requested PCRs
4. Return the result to the requesting vTPM
The change I am suggesting requires:
- Add a field to the request - extraInfoFlags
- Compute externData = SHA1 (
requestData
extraInfoFlags
[UUIDs if requested]
[vTPM measurements if requested]
[vTPM group update policy if requested]
)
- Perform deep quotes using the above externData value instead of the
value provided by the vTPM.
This change also has the benefit of increasing the flexibility of the
request - it is simple to define additional flags and add data to the hash
if needed.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 11/05/2014 05:00 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
CCing Daniel.
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 17:37 +0200, Emil Condrea wrote:
I am wondering if this is known issue that when I set locality!=0 to
vtpmmgr it does not start. It is a bit strange that every call to
tpm_tis_status returns 255 and device-id is also FFFF:
1.2 TPM (device-id=0xFFFF vendor-id = FFFF rev-id = FF).
TPM interface capabilities (0xffffffff):
I am configuring vtpmmgr using:
kernel="/usr/local/lib/xen/boot/vtpmmgr-stubdom.gz"
memory=8
disk=["file:/var/vtpmmgr-stubdom.img,hda,w"]
name="vtpmmgr"
iomem=["fed40,5"]
extra="tpmlocality=2"
I also tried using :
iomem=["fed40,1"]
extra="tpmlocality=0"//works well
or
iomem=["fed42,1"]
extra="tpmlocality=2"
It seems that everything that is not mapped at fed40-fed41 is
FFFFFFFF.
I have an Atmel TPM chipset.
Could it be a chipset problem to not handle well different localities?
When I use locality=0, the device driver info is correct and
everything works fine:
1.2 TPM (device-id=0x3204 vendor-id = 1114 rev-id = 40)
TPM interface capabilities (0xfd)
This may be an issue with locality 2 being unavailable unless a DRTM
launch (tboot) is performed. Returning all-ones is the normal response
of the x86 chipset when unmapped MMIO regions are accessed; disabled
localities of the TPM may act like this.
Does your system support the DRTM launch? If so, can you test it to see
if this is the issue?
In this case, to better support people who want to use the vTPM Manager
without a DRTM launch, the features of the vTPM Manager that use the TPM
1.2 PCRs may need to be disabled or implemented in an alternate manner
such as embedding the data in the quote instead of in PCRs. The current
design was created with the assumption that systems using it would be
performing a DRTM launch in order to fully secure the boot process.
In linux kernel this information is obtained using locality 0 and
after that other commands execute using specified locality.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-
stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c#n558
Have you tested that other localities work for your TPM under Linux?
Thanks,
Emil
--
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency
--
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency
--
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
