[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 09/11] xen: arm: add cpufreq shared info definition
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote: >> This shared info will be used by hwdom-cpufreq driver >> to send commands to the cpufreq driver in the hwdom. >> >> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn <oleksandr.dmytryshyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> xen/include/asm-arm/shared.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 8 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/shared.h >> >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/shared.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/shared.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..4906f38 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/shared.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ >> +#ifndef __XEN_ARM_SHARED_H__ >> +#define __XEN_ARM_SHARED_H__ >> + >> +#define GET_SET_SHARED(type, field) \ >> +static inline type *arch_get_##field##_addr(const struct domain *d) \ >> +{ \ >> + return &d->shared_info->arch.field; \ >> +} >> + >> +GET_SET_SHARED(struct cpufreq_sh_info, cpufreq) >> + >> +#undef GET_SET_SHARED >> + >> +#endif /* __XEN_ARM_SHARED_H__ */ >> diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >> index 7496556..7eef6f7 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >> @@ -309,7 +309,15 @@ struct arch_vcpu_info { >> }; >> typedef struct arch_vcpu_info arch_vcpu_info_t; >> >> +struct cpufreq_sh_info { >> + uint32_t cpu; /* Physical CPU number */ >> + uint32_t freq; /* Frequency in KHz */ >> + uint32_t relation; /* CPUFREQ_RELATION_L/H (0) or (1) */ >> + int32_t result; /* Returned result of the operation */ >> +}; >> + >> struct arch_shared_info { >> + struct cpufreq_sh_info cpufreq; >> }; >> typedef struct arch_shared_info arch_shared_info_t; >> typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t; > > This introduces one global struct cpufreq_sh_info. Do we need to worry > about locking? Is it possible that we might want to send two commands > simultaneously? How does Xen get to know that Dom0 completed the > previous operation before starting a new one? As I've written before: I'll create an event channel between Xen and hwdom. In this case Xen will be able to know that hwdom completed the previous operation before starting a new one. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |