|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hvm/load: Correct length checks for zeroextended records
>>> On 23.10.14 at 12:50, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the case that Xen is attempting to load a zeroextended HVM record where the
> difference needing extending would overflow the data blob,
> _hvm_check_entry()
> will incorrectly fail before working out that it would have been safe.
>
> The "len + sizeof(*d)" check is wrong. Consider zeroextending a 16 byte
> record into a 32 byte structure. "32 + hdr" will fail the overall context
> length check even though the pre-extended record in the stream is 16 bytes.
>
> The first condition is reduced to just a length check for hvm save header,
> while the second condition is extended to include a check that the record in
> the stream not exceeding the stream length.
>
> The error messages are extended to include further useful information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
albeit with a comment:
> --- a/xen/common/hvm/save.c
> +++ b/xen/common/hvm/save.c
> @@ -292,19 +292,22 @@ int _hvm_check_entry(struct hvm_domain_context *h,
> {
> struct hvm_save_descriptor *d
> = (struct hvm_save_descriptor *)&h->data[h->cur];
> - if ( len + sizeof (*d) > h->size - h->cur)
> + if ( sizeof(*d) > h->size - h->cur)
> {
> printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
> - "HVM restore: not enough data left to read %u bytes "
> - "for type %u\n", len, type);
> + "HVM restore: not enough data left to read %zu bytes "
> + "for type %u header\n", sizeof(*d), type);
> return -1;
> - }
> + }
> if ( (type != d->typecode) || (len < d->length) ||
> - (strict_length && (len != d->length)) )
> + (strict_length && (len != d->length)) ||
If this is already being overhauled, I'd really like to at once switch to
if ( (type != d->typecode) ||
(strict_length ? (len != d->length) : (len < d->length)) ||
to make more obvious what is really being checked here. Definitely
no reason to re-submit though.
Jan
> + (d->length > (h->size - h->cur - sizeof(*d))) )
> {
> printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
> - "HVM restore mismatch: expected type %u length %u, "
> - "saw type %u length %u\n", type, len, d->typecode, d->length);
> + "HVM restore mismatch: expected %s type %u length %u, "
> + "saw type %u length %u. %zu bytes remaining\n",
> + strict_length ? "strict" : "zeroextended", type, len,
> + d->typecode, d->length, h->size - h->cur - sizeof(*d));
> return -1;
> }
> h->cur += sizeof(*d);
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |