[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 04/27] arm/MSI: Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c >> index 22e413c..f11108c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c >> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct >> msi_desc *desc) >> struct msi_chip *chip = dev->bus->msi; >> int err; >> >> + if (!chip) >> + chip = pci_msi_chip(dev->bus); >> + >> if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> @@ -50,6 +53,9 @@ void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq) >> struct msi_desc *entry = irq_get_msi_desc(irq); >> struct msi_chip *chip = entry->dev->bus->msi; >> >> + if (!chip) >> + chip = pci_msi_chip(entry->dev->bus); >> + >> if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq) >> return; >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h >> index 9cd2721..7a48b40 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h >> @@ -1433,6 +1433,15 @@ static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { >> return -ENOSYS; } >> >> #include <asm/pci.h> >> >> +/* Just avoid compile error, will be clean up later */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >> + >> +#ifndef pci_msi_chip >> +#define pci_msi_chip(bus) NULL >> +#endif >> +#endif > > I don't like the mixture of ARM changes and PCI core changes in the same > patch. Can you split this into a core patch that does something like this: > > struct msi_chip * __weak pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > return NULL; > } > > struct msi_chip *pci_msi_controller(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > msi_chip *controller = bus->msi; > > if (controller) > return controller; > return pcibios_msi_controller(bus); > } > > followed by an ARM patch that puts the msi_chip pointer in struct hw_pci > and implements pcibios_msi_controller()? OK, I will split it in half. > > I know you're trying to *remove* weak functions, and this adds one, but > this section of the series is more about getting rid of the ARM > pcibios_add_bus() because all it was used for was setting the bus->msi > pointer. Yes, agree. > > Eventually we might have a way to stash an MSI controller pointer in the > generic pci_host_bridge struct, and then the pcibios_msi_controller() > interface could go away. Yep, I am doing the work to make a generic pci_host_bridge, and try to rip it out from pci_create_root_bus, that's also a large changes across many archs. > >> + >> /* these helpers provide future and backwards compatibility >> * for accessing popular PCI BAR info */ >> #define pci_resource_start(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].start) >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |