[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Is it safe to assume that v == current in hvm_do_resume()?
- To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:11:41 +0300
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:11:51 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=bitdefender.com; b=X6zJIA9KBM3vu+9gP3JM6QGQY0Nmowd2G3xTXU+qxu7k0JZavAwGsGCV5RS1dxc76lWJGn1+BXjVBqQDFUbLMKqOaKnxzYMrMiLaqsVM6w72aYXCs8iL98A3sZbJWW8xnEg2OAvFe+Fc3xajRsdHji5ByNXRXAKdlRq5xgJkGDDJDBmdNKNMb6g0SjWUYPIT+CnIKrPuy38BSbXA6v6ERCqDA4HsLZL+C7GsOyNQzkerHJQkIu7aA/UtOQBIsKkgu+7cvfsYSrNiiXEp3jI0JaTVB8mewEXJ823k6kvD+WeYR54VI8vCf05SspxLuS445U4whu+YYfYlAapeTbLIow==; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BitDefender-Scanner:X-BitDefender-Spam:X-BitDefender-SpamStamp:X-BitDefender-CF-Stamp;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Hello,
As far as I've understood the code, and based on several tests, it would
appear that in xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c, the struct vcpu *v parameter to
hvm_do_resume() is always equal to current.
Is that a reasonable assumption to make? I could have missed some use
cases for the function.
Thanks,
Razvan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
