[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/1] xen-hvm.c: Add support for Xen access to vmport
> -----Original Message----- > From: Don Slutz [mailto:dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 17 October 2014 13:14 > To: qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; Paul Durrant > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alexander Graf; Andreas Färber; > Anthony Liguori; Don Slutz; Marcel Apfelbaum; Markus Armbruster; Michael > S. Tsirkin; Stefano Stabellini > Subject: [PATCH v4 1/1] xen-hvm.c: Add support for Xen access to vmport > > This adds synchronisation of the 6 vcpu registers (only 32bits of > them) that vmport.c needs between Xen and QEMU. > > This is to avoid a 2nd and 3rd exchange between QEMU and Xen to > fetch and put these 6 vcpu registers used by the code in vmport.c > and vmmouse.c > > The registers are passed in the new shared page provided by > HVM_PARAM_VMPORT_IOREQ_PFN. > > Add new array to XenIOState that allows selection of current_cpu by > ioreq_id. > > Now pass XenIOState to handle_ioreq(). > > Add new routines regs_to_cpu(), regs_from_cpu(), and > handle_vmport_ioreq(). > > Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/hw/xen/xen_common.h | 15 ++++++ > xen-hvm.c | 121 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/hw/xen/xen_common.h > b/include/hw/xen/xen_common.h > index 07731b9..9542756 100644 > --- a/include/hw/xen/xen_common.h > +++ b/include/hw/xen/xen_common.h > @@ -164,4 +164,19 @@ void destroy_hvm_domain(bool reboot); > /* shutdown/destroy current domain because of an error */ > void xen_shutdown_fatal_error(const char *fmt, ...) GCC_FMT_ATTR(1, 2); > > +#ifdef HVM_PARAM_VMPORT_IOREQ_PFN > +static inline int xen_get_vmport_ioreq_pfn(XenXC xc, domid_t dom, > + unsigned long *vmport_ioreq_pfn) > +{ > + return xc_get_hvm_param(xc, dom, > HVM_PARAM_VMPORT_IOREQ_PFN, > + vmport_ioreq_pfn); > +} > +#else > +static inline int xen_get_vmport_ioreq_pfn(XenXC xc, domid_t dom, > + unsigned long *vmport_ioreq_pfn) > +{ > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > +#endif > + > #endif /* QEMU_HW_XEN_COMMON_H */ > diff --git a/xen-hvm.c b/xen-hvm.c > index 05e522c..17b3cbd 100644 > --- a/xen-hvm.c > +++ b/xen-hvm.c > @@ -41,6 +41,29 @@ static MemoryRegion *framebuffer; > static bool xen_in_migration; > > /* Compatibility with older version */ > + > +/* This allows QEMU to build on a system that has Xen 4.5 or earlier > + * installed. This here (not in hw/xen/xen_common.h) because > xen/hvm/ioreq.h > + * needs to be included before this block and hw/xen/xen_common.h > needs to > + * be included before xen/hvm/ioreq.h > + */ > +#ifndef IOREQ_TYPE_VMWARE_PORT > +#define IOREQ_TYPE_VMWARE_PORT 3 > +struct vmware_ioreq { > + uint32_t esi; > + uint32_t edi; > + uint32_t ebx; > + uint32_t ecx; > + uint32_t edx; > +}; > +typedef struct vmware_ioreq vmware_ioreq_t; This struct is not really a request any more. Maybe vmware_regs_t? > + > +struct shared_vmport_iopage { > + struct vmware_ioreq vcpu_vmport_ioreq[1]; > +}; > +typedef struct shared_vmport_iopage shared_vmport_iopage_t; > +#endif > + > #if __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ < 0x0003020a > static inline uint32_t xen_vcpu_eport(shared_iopage_t *shared_page, int i) > { > @@ -79,8 +102,10 @@ typedef struct XenPhysmap { > > typedef struct XenIOState { > shared_iopage_t *shared_page; > + shared_vmport_iopage_t *shared_vmport_page; > buffered_iopage_t *buffered_io_page; > QEMUTimer *buffered_io_timer; > + CPUState **cpu_by_ioreq_id; This name implies the array is indexed by an id carries in the ioreq. That doesn't seem to be the case; it's just indexed by guest vcpu id isn't it? > /* the evtchn port for polling the notification, */ > evtchn_port_t *ioreq_local_port; > /* evtchn local port for buffered io */ > @@ -101,6 +126,8 @@ typedef struct XenIOState { > Notifier wakeup; > } XenIOState; > > +static void handle_ioreq(XenIOState *state, ioreq_t *req); > + > /* Xen specific function for piix pci */ > > int xen_pci_slot_get_pirq(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int irq_num) > @@ -610,6 +637,20 @@ static ioreq_t > *cpu_get_ioreq_from_shared_memory(XenIOState *state, int vcpu) > return req; > } > > +/* get the vmport ioreq packets from share mem */ > +static vmware_ioreq_t *cpu_get_vmport_ioreq_from_shared_memory( Is this worth its own function? I can only see one use of it in handle_vmport_ioreq below... > + XenIOState *state, int vcpu) > +{ > + vmware_ioreq_t *vmport_req; > + > + assert(state->shared_vmport_page); > + vmport_req = &state->shared_vmport_page- > >vcpu_vmport_ioreq[vcpu]; > + > + xen_rmb(); /* see IOREQ_READY /then/ read contents of ioreq */ I don't think that comment is applicable here, and I don't think you need the barrier anyway. > + > + return vmport_req; > +} > + > /* use poll to get the port notification */ > /* ioreq_vec--out,the */ > /* retval--the number of ioreq packet */ > @@ -773,7 +814,50 @@ static void cpu_ioreq_move(ioreq_t *req) > } > } > > -static void handle_ioreq(ioreq_t *req) > +static void regs_to_cpu(XenIOState *state, vmware_ioreq_t *vmport_req, > + ioreq_t *req) > +{ > + X86CPU *cpu; > + CPUX86State *env; > + > + current_cpu = state->cpu_by_ioreq_id[state->send_vcpu]; > + cpu = X86_CPU(current_cpu); > + env = &cpu->env; > + env->regs[R_EAX] = req->data; > + env->regs[R_EBX] = vmport_req->ebx; > + env->regs[R_ECX] = vmport_req->ecx; > + env->regs[R_EDX] = vmport_req->edx; > + env->regs[R_ESI] = vmport_req->esi; > + env->regs[R_EDI] = vmport_req->edi; > +} > + > +static void regs_from_cpu(XenIOState *state, vmware_ioreq_t > *vmport_req, > + ioreq_t *req) > +{ > + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(current_cpu); > + CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env; > + > + assert(sizeof(*vmport_req) <= sizeof(*req)); Why? > + > + vmport_req->ebx = env->regs[R_EBX]; > + vmport_req->ecx = env->regs[R_ECX]; > + vmport_req->edx = env->regs[R_EDX]; > + vmport_req->esi = env->regs[R_ESI]; > + vmport_req->edi = env->regs[R_EDI]; > + current_cpu = NULL; > +} > + > +static void handle_vmport_ioreq(XenIOState *state, ioreq_t *req) > +{ > + vmware_ioreq_t *vmport_req = > + cpu_get_vmport_ioreq_from_shared_memory(state, state- > >send_vcpu); > + > + regs_to_cpu(state, vmport_req, req); > + cpu_ioreq_pio(req); > + regs_from_cpu(state, vmport_req, req); state appears to be unused in this function, and you could avoid passing it to both of them by setting current_cpu here couldn't you? Paul > +} > + > +static void handle_ioreq(XenIOState *state, ioreq_t *req) > { > if (!req->data_is_ptr && (req->dir == IOREQ_WRITE) && > (req->size < sizeof (target_ulong))) { > @@ -787,6 +871,9 @@ static void handle_ioreq(ioreq_t *req) > case IOREQ_TYPE_COPY: > cpu_ioreq_move(req); > break; > + case IOREQ_TYPE_VMWARE_PORT: > + handle_vmport_ioreq(state, req); > + break; > case IOREQ_TYPE_TIMEOFFSET: > break; > case IOREQ_TYPE_INVALIDATE: > @@ -828,7 +915,7 @@ static int handle_buffered_iopage(XenIOState > *state) > req.data |= ((uint64_t)buf_req->data) << 32; > } > > - handle_ioreq(&req); > + handle_ioreq(state, &req); > > xen_mb(); > state->buffered_io_page->read_pointer += qw ? 2 : 1; > @@ -857,14 +944,16 @@ static void cpu_handle_ioreq(void *opaque) > > handle_buffered_iopage(state); > if (req) { > - handle_ioreq(req); > + handle_ioreq(state, req); > > if (req->state != STATE_IOREQ_INPROCESS) { > fprintf(stderr, "Badness in I/O request ... not in service?!: " > "%x, ptr: %x, port: %"PRIx64", " > - "data: %"PRIx64", count: %" FMT_ioreq_size ", size: %" > FMT_ioreq_size "\n", > + "data: %"PRIx64", count: %" FMT_ioreq_size > + ", size: %" FMT_ioreq_size > + ", type: %"FMT_ioreq_size"\n", > req->state, req->data_is_ptr, req->addr, > - req->data, req->count, req->size); > + req->data, req->count, req->size, req->type); > destroy_hvm_domain(false); > return; > } > @@ -904,6 +993,14 @@ static void xen_main_loop_prepare(XenIOState > *state) > state); > > if (evtchn_fd != -1) { > + CPUState *cpu_state; > + > + DPRINTF("%s: Init cpu_by_ioreq_id\n", __func__); > + CPU_FOREACH(cpu_state) { > + DPRINTF("%s: cpu_by_ioreq_id[%d]=%p\n", > + __func__, cpu_state->cpu_index, cpu_state); > + state->cpu_by_ioreq_id[cpu_state->cpu_index] = cpu_state; > + } > qemu_set_fd_handler(evtchn_fd, cpu_handle_ioreq, NULL, state); > } > } > @@ -1020,6 +1117,17 @@ int xen_hvm_init(ram_addr_t > *below_4g_mem_size, ram_addr_t *above_4g_mem_size, > errno, xen_xc); > } > > + if (!xen_get_vmport_ioreq_pfn(xen_xc, xen_domid, &ioreq_pfn)) { > + DPRINTF("shared vmport page at pfn %lx\n", ioreq_pfn); > + state->shared_vmport_page = > + xc_map_foreign_range(xen_xc, xen_domid, XC_PAGE_SIZE, > + PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, ioreq_pfn); > + if (state->shared_vmport_page == NULL) { > + hw_error("map shared vmport IO page returned error %d handle=" > + XC_INTERFACE_FMT, errno, xen_xc); > + } > + } > + > xc_get_hvm_param(xen_xc, xen_domid, HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_PFN, > &ioreq_pfn); > DPRINTF("buffered io page at pfn %lx\n", ioreq_pfn); > state->buffered_io_page = xc_map_foreign_range(xen_xc, xen_domid, > XC_PAGE_SIZE, > @@ -1028,6 +1136,9 @@ int xen_hvm_init(ram_addr_t > *below_4g_mem_size, ram_addr_t *above_4g_mem_size, > hw_error("map buffered IO page returned error %d", errno); > } > > + /* Note: cpus is empty at this point in init */ > + state->cpu_by_ioreq_id = g_malloc0(max_cpus * sizeof(CPUState *)); > + > state->ioreq_local_port = g_malloc0(max_cpus * sizeof (evtchn_port_t)); > > /* FIXME: how about if we overflow the page here? */ > -- > 1.8.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |