[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add IOREQ_TYPE_VMWARE_PORT
On 09/29/14 07:13, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 26/09/2014 20:51, Don Slutz ha scritto:+ memcpy(®s->rax, &vio->io_data, vio->io_size);Shouldn't this match the code you use below for case HVMIO_handle_vmport_awaiting_completion? Nope. This path is either: vio->io_state == HVMIO_completed at entry or the the error path for "If there is no backing DM". In both cases what to put in rax is in vio->io_data with vio->io_size set also. This code comes from hvmemul_do_io(). -Don Slutz Paolo+ return X86EMUL_OKAY; +} + static int hvmemul_do_io( int is_mmio, paddr_t addr, unsigned long *reps, int size, paddr_t ram_gpa, int dir, int df, void *p_data) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c index 9f565d6..96ef3ff 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c @@ -206,6 +206,25 @@ void hvm_io_assist(ioreq_t *p) else memcpy(&guest_cpu_user_regs()->rax, &p->data, vio->io_size); break; + case HVMIO_handle_vmport_awaiting_completion: + { + struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); + + /* Always zero extension for eax */ + regs->rax = (uint32_t)(p->addr >> 32); + /* Only zero extension if 32bit register changed */ + if ( (uint32_t)regs->rbx != (uint32_t)p->addr ) + regs->rbx = (uint32_t)p->addr; + if ( (uint32_t)regs->rcx != (uint32_t)p->count ) + regs->rcx = (uint32_t)p->count; + if ( (uint32_t)regs->rdx != (uint32_t)p->size ) + regs->rdx = (uint32_t)p->size; + if ( (uint32_t)regs->rsi != (uint32_t)(p->data >> 32) ) + regs->rsi = (uint32_t)(p->data >> 32); + if ( (uint32_t)regs->rdi != (uint32_t)p->data ) + regs->rdi = (uint32_t)p->data; + } _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |