[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.5 development update (September update). Feature freeze slip by two weeks.
- To: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:42:18 -0400
- Cc: Artem Mygaiev <artem.mygaiev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Wilson <msw@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gross@xxxxxxxx, dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx, mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zhigang.x.wang@xxxxxxxxxx, Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul.Skentzos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, guijianfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>, josh.whitehead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zoltan.kiss@xxxxxxxxxx, Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@xxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Serge Broslavsky <serge.broslavsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx, yjhyun.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxx, olaf@xxxxxxxxx, Steve.Vande.rLeest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Luis Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Leonard <talex5@xxxxxxxxx>, robert.vanvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shantong.kang@xxxxxxxxx, Roy Franz <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx>, yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx, Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx, Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, dave.scott@xxxxxxxxxx, Wei.Liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindp@xxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suriyan Ramasami <suriyan.r@xxxxxxxxx>, dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, Kelly Zytaruk <Kelly.Zytaruk@xxxxxxx>, dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx, Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx, "Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx, "suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx, malcolm.crossley@xxxxxxxxxx, yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:42:47 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:23:57PM +0200, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> I would like to ask for an exception for this feature:
>
> * ARM implement mem_access (ok)
> > v5
> > https://github.com/tklengyel/xen/tree/arm_memaccess5
> > - Tamas K Lengyel
> >
>
> The version 9 of the series will be posted tomorrow. The first half of the
> series (cleanup and relocation) is mostly acked and mergeable and there had
> been some discussion that it might be merged before the second half
> (ARM-specific bits) are finished with the review process (which are IMHO
> also very close to the finish line).
As you saw Jan already merged the mergable patches (up to 10 I believe).
The rest will take some time to review.
I need to discuss this with Tim and also look at the patches to get a feel
for:
- What is the risk of it introducing regressions for existing use-cases.
- What is the risk if these features do not make it in Xen 4.5
(What are the external impacts of this - what are the sub-projects
that depend on this).
- What is the awesomes of this. As in, how will this feature make
Xen more awesome.
- How easy is it for somebody to set this up and test it out?
Thank you!
>
> Thanks,
> Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
