[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Project policy on feature flags
>>> On 26.09.14 at 16:26, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 26/09/14 14:24, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> I always thought that any XENFEAT feature flags could be removed going >> forward, if the hypervisor maintainers decide to do so. However Ian >> Campbell is of the opposite opinion, so I think we should have a clear >> policy regarding them. > > A guest that runs on Xen version V /must/ continue to run on V+1. > > The is similar to the policy the Linux kernel has for the user space ABI. Linux has proven a number of times that it doesn't always care about such compatibility. The most prominent example being a major sysfs layout rework in 2.6.37 which broke many older systems of mine. I view feature flags much more like CPUs announcing certain capabilities via CPUID - this is no guarantee that all that functionality will also be present in future CPUs. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |