[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC/WIPv2 0/6] toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec
Hi Vitaly, On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 16:20 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: I assume this is targeting 4.6? With the 4.5 freeze happening as we speak many folks attention is on that, at least that's true for me (with my toolstack hat on). If you don't hear soon perhaps ping in a couple of weeks? Ian. > When a PVHVM linux guest performs kexec there are lots of things which > require taking care of: > - shared info, vcpu_info > - grants > - event channels > - ... > Instead of taking care of all these things we can rebuild the domain > performing kexec from scratch doing so-called soft-reboot. > > The idea was suggested by David Vrabel, Jan Beulich, and Konrad Rzeszutek > Wilk. > > Main RFC part: > I'm not sure my suggested XENMEM_transfer op is the right way to go: > - If we steal pages from a particular domain it should be dead as it makes no > sense to it after such the call. > - we need to copy all L1-L4 pages, rebuild the shared info ... for PV. This > will result in additional complexity in libxc (rebuilding the p2m). > - we also need to keep track of all copied L1-L4 pages for PV as we'll be > re-creating p2m. > > I can see three possible ways to go: > 1) Forbid the call for PV and remove this part from libxc. The easiest way to > go (and PV kexec/kdump will require additional work on kernel side anyway). > 2) Go ahead and rebuild p2m in libxc (similar to what we have for save/restore > path). > 3) Instead of XENMEM_transfer introduce special oneshot domain kill op which > will follow the same domain_kill path but instead of relinquishing > resources > it will reassign them. I suppose it will be posible to reassign L1-L4 pages > and pages from xenheap here as well. > > What would you say? > > WIP part: > - PV support is broken. > - Not sure huge pages will work well. > - Not sure about ARM/PVH. > - Not tested with qemu-upstream. > > P.S. The patch series can be tested with PVHVM Linux guest with the following > modifications: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > index c0cb11f..33c5cdd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ > #include <linux/memblock.h> > #include <linux/edd.h> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC > +#include <linux/kexec.h> > +#endif > + > #include <xen/xen.h> > #include <xen/events.h> > #include <xen/interface/xen.h> > @@ -1810,6 +1814,22 @@ static struct notifier_block xen_hvm_cpu_notifier = { > .notifier_call = xen_hvm_cpu_notify, > }; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC > +static void xen_pvhvm_kexec_shutdown(void) > +{ > + native_machine_shutdown(); > + if (kexec_in_progress) { > + xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_soft_reset); > + } > +} > + > +static void xen_pvhvm_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + native_machine_crash_shutdown(regs); > + xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_soft_reset); > +} > +#endif > + > static void __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void) > { > init_hvm_pv_info(); > @@ -1826,6 +1846,10 @@ static void __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void) > x86_init.irqs.intr_init = xen_init_IRQ; > xen_hvm_init_time_ops(); > xen_hvm_init_mmu_ops(); > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC > + machine_ops.shutdown = xen_pvhvm_kexec_shutdown; > + machine_ops.crash_shutdown = xen_pvhvm_crash_shutdown; > +#endif > } > > static bool xen_nopv = false; > diff --git a/include/xen/interface/sched.h b/include/xen/interface/sched.h > index 9ce0839..b5942a8 100644 > --- a/include/xen/interface/sched.h > +++ b/include/xen/interface/sched.h > @@ -107,5 +107,6 @@ struct sched_watchdog { > #define SHUTDOWN_suspend 2 /* Clean up, save suspend info, kill. > */ > #define SHUTDOWN_crash 3 /* Tell controller we've crashed. > */ > #define SHUTDOWN_watchdog 4 /* Restart because watchdog time expired. > */ > +#define SHUTDOWN_soft_reset 5 /* Soft-reset for kexec. > */ > > #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_SCHED_H__ */ > > Vitaly Kuznetsov (6): > Introduce XENMEM_transfer operation > libxc: support XENMEM_transfer operation > libxc: introduce soft reset > xen: Introduce SHUTDOWN_soft_reset shutdown reason > libxl: support SHUTDOWN_soft_reset shutdown reason > libxl: soft reset support > > tools/libxc/Makefile | 1 + > tools/libxc/xc_domain.c | 19 +++ > tools/libxc/xc_domain_soft_reset.c | 300 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/libxc/xenctrl.h | 6 + > tools/libxc/xenguest.h | 19 +++ > tools/libxl/libxl.h | 6 + > tools/libxl/libxl_create.c | 100 +++++++++++-- > tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h | 5 + > tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl | 1 + > tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c | 31 +++- > tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xl/xl.c | 1 + > xen/common/memory.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/common/shutdown.c | 7 + > xen/include/public/memory.h | 32 +++- > xen/include/public/sched.h | 3 +- > 15 files changed, 695 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 tools/libxc/xc_domain_soft_reset.c > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |