Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] libxl: save/restore callbacks: enforce a useful errno value

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 3/3] libxl: save/restore callbacks: enforce a 
useful errno value"):
> On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For one of the call sites it is obvious what value should be passed.
> > 
> > All the others have been left untouched.  As a result the code now
> > DOES NOT COMPILE.
> 
> I suppose the intention here is that Wen takes this as a basis and makes
> it return the appropriate error codes to suit remus's usage?

Yes.  I'm afraid it's far from clear to me what is correct and there
are about a dozen call sites (many of which are trivial and are
themselves called from somewhere else...)

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel