Re: [Xen-devel] [PING] various patches

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:19 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> "REST"-maintainers,
> 
> is there any chance I could gets acks or otherwise on
> 
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg01751.html

This looks like x86 rather than rest? In any case it seems like Andrew
is looking into it, and if he is happy with it I think that should be
sufficient for you to go ahead.

> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02105.html

I don't see anything wrong with this, but I'm not sure if the reasons
for Keir's original concerns have now gone away or the circumstances
have changed etc.

> Also, does anyone have comments on the approach taken in
> 
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02103.html
> 
> (see namely the not to be committed part of the description)?

The bit about migration to an older hypervisor not working? I think you
are right that we don't care to support that.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel