[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/17] Mem_event and mem_access for ARM
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 16:01 +0200, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > So I think up to here the series could go in afaic. Question > is - does > this make sense without the ARM parts? > > Thanks, Jan > > > Without the ARM parts there is no technical need for it. On the other > hand, there are many other series pending in the same general area so > having this part merged would put everyone on the same footing to > resolve conflicts and to move forward from. I think it would be perfectly fine/useful for the generic parts to go in before the ARM part is ready, it's harmless refactoring and it will reduce the amount of stuff which is being needlessly resent as later patches get reviewed (since this is quite a long series that's pretty significant IMHO). Also A series which moves code around can be a pain to rebase, especially if other changes are happening in the surrounding code, I think if it is ready it should go in. Plus as you say it forms a basis for your's and other's ongoing development. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |