[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/17] Mem_event and mem_access for ARM



On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 16:01 +0200, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:

>         So I think up to here the series could go in afaic. Question
>         is - does
>         this make sense without the ARM parts?
>         
>         Thanks, Jan
> 
> 
> Without the ARM parts there is no technical need for it. On the other
> hand, there are many other series pending in the same general area so
> having this part merged would put everyone on the same footing to
> resolve conflicts and to move forward from.

I think it would be perfectly fine/useful for the generic parts to go in
before the ARM part is ready, it's harmless refactoring and it will
reduce the amount of stuff which is being needlessly resent as later
patches get reviewed (since this is quite a long series that's pretty
significant IMHO). 

Also A series which moves code around can be a pain to rebase,
especially if other changes are happening in the surrounding code, I
think if it is ready it should go in.

Plus as you say it forms a basis for your's and other's ongoing
development.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.