Re: [Xen-devel] [v6][PATCH 2/2] xen:vtd: missing RMRR mapping while share EPT

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2014/9/12 15:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 12.09.14 at 08:38, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2014/9/3 17:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 03.09.14 at 11:41, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > Additionally, I want to know if patch v6 is fine to be acked.
> > > > > My position hasn't changed: I view this as correct but incomplete,
> > > > > and hence not ready for inclusion. With - iirc - Tim being of a
> > > > > different opinion, if you want to push for a decision without
> > > > > supplying the missing pieces, see the section "Conflict Resolution"
> > > > > on http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html. But of course
> > > > > I'd much prefer to avoid having to fall back to this, and instead
> > > > > have a complete patch set to commit within reasonable time.
> > > > Looks I can't make my RFC patches to implement a complete RMRR
> > > > supporting better as you pointed while reviewing, so I have to go back
> > > > looking at this.
> > > Please just give me a little time to hand you a replacement patch on
> > > which you could then base the rest of your series. But please also
> > > realize that this isn't my top priority.
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > So how can I issue such a private vote on these two patches? I don't see
> > > > How-to in the section "Conflict Resolution" on
> > > > http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html.
> > Jan,
> >
> > I have to admit its really hard to push this RMRR RFC with my
> > experiences and skills. Currently every new revision doesn't minimize
> > all previous comments. Instead, it always brings more comments or
> > arguments. So I don't think myself can do this very well in Xen side.
> >
> > So I still hope we can issue such a vote on these two patches if possible.
> Lars, how would we go about this?
>
> > Once I have enough capability to cover this I can go back or other guys
> > may do really better than me.
> I already helped you with the first patch. Did you ask the VT-d
Yes, this already costs more our time as you said, and this is also one 
reason why I'm saying myself can't finish this series completely.
Recently looks we have to re-concern this to cover more scenarios, 
hotplug, migration and so forth. I don't think I already have a clear 
design to address everything.
Originally that series is just as RFC. And I believe you already don't 
hope I post too much more incomplete codes to you again.
> maintainers for help with the rest?
Ditto.

Thanks
Tiejun

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel