Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 17/17] tools/tests: Enable xen-access on ARM

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Tamas,

On 10/09/14 06:28, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> diff --git a/config/arm32.mk b/config/arm32.mk
> index aa79d22..4a7c259 100644
> --- a/config/arm32.mk
> +++ b/config/arm32.mk
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ HAS_PL011 := y
>   HAS_EXYNOS4210 := y
>   HAS_OMAP := y
>   HAS_NS16550 := y
> +HAS_MEM_ACCESS := y
>
>   # Use only if calling $(LD) directly.
>   LDFLAGS_DIRECT += -EL
> diff --git a/config/arm64.mk b/config/arm64.mk
> index 15b57a4..ea6558d 100644
> --- a/config/arm64.mk
> +++ b/config/arm64.mk
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ CFLAGS += #-marm -march= -mcpu= etc
>
>   HAS_PL011 := y
>   HAS_NS16550 := y
> +HAS_MEM_ACCESS := y
Why can't you move HAS_MEM_ACCESS directly here in patch #1?

It would make this patch simpler.


[..]

> @@ -492,8 +523,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>           goto exit;
>       }
>
> -    rc = xc_set_mem_access(xch, domain_id, default_access, 0,
> -                           xenaccess->domain_info->max_pages);
> +    rc = xc_set_mem_access(xch, domain_id, default_access, START_PFN,
> +                           (xenaccess->domain_info->max_gpfn - START_PFN) );
> +
max_gpfn contains the maximum GPFN mapped (it could be foreign page, 
MMIO range...).
Before memaccess was used only on RAM. Now it can contains any other 
page type.
I think this code has to be smarter and take into account the banks on ARM.

Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel