[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v6][PATCH 0/7] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM
On 2014/9/11 5:44, Tian, Kevin wrote: From: Chen, Tiejun Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:50 PMcurrently the confliction is detected absolutely. Do we need a way to allow the confliction if there is no device assigned at all? How to handle a hot-plug case when guest already boot? I think it may not be worth distinguishing such fine gain, things will be becoming complicated. Thanks Tiejun v6: * Jan cleanup to regenerate one patch to replace the two original patches then rebase the others. * Refine all patches short/long logs. * Replace those info with 'reserved device memory maps' and s/RMRR/RDM. * Fix some code styles. * Fix one interation error when we grab e820 info This is not valid when j == nr - 1 (last iteration). * Cleanup some codes. * One comment to introduce a new field, nr_reserved_device_memory_map libxc/hvm_info_table, is still pending to wait the tools maintainer's further comment. v5: * Add patch #2 to introduce a global count, acpi_rmrr_unit_entries. * Refine hypercall return value to make sure the caller can distinguish clearly between "xen filled in N entries" and "xen said you need N entries for all information". * Refine some structures * Then Rebase v4: * Drop the original patch #1. Instead, we use acpi_rmrr_units to get rmrr info directly. * Refine the hypercall definition to make sure we can use it safely. * Introduce introduce nr_reserved_device_memory_map in hvm_info_table, then we can avoid issue unnecessary hypercall, even we can know current RMRR entries to issue hypercall one time. * Cleanup and rebase v3: * Use XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map to replace XENMEM_RMRR_memory_map * Then rebase all patches v2: * Don't use e820map to define RMRR maps directly to avoid any confusion. * In patch #3 we introduce construct_rmrr_e820_maps() to check if we can insert RMRR maps and then we will sort all e820 entries. * Clean patch #4 * In patch #5 we reuse check_mmio_hole() to check if current mmio range is fine to RMRR maps. If not, we just issue error to notify the user since mostly mmio should be configured again. While we work for supporting RMRR mapping for Windows GFX driver in case shared table, http://osdir.com/ml/general/2014-07/msg55347.html http://osdir.com/ml/general/2014-07/msg55348.html we realize we should reserve RMRR range to avoid any potential MMIO/RAM overlap with our discussion so here these preliminary patches are intended to cover this. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Jan Beulich (1): introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen (6): tools/libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map tools/libxc: check if mmio BAR is out of reserved device memory maps libxc/hvm_info_table: introduce a new field nr_reserved_device_memory_map hvmloader: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map hvmloader: check to reserved device memory maps in e820 xen/vtd: make USB RMRR mapping safe tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h | 3 +++ tools/libxc/xc_domain.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/libxc/xc_hvm_build_x86.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++-- tools/libxc/xenctrl.h | 4 ++++ xen/common/compat/memory.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/common/memory.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 10 ++++++++++ xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/extern.h | 1 + xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 9 +-------- xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_info_table.h | 3 +++ xen/include/public/memory.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 4 ++++ xen/include/xlat.lst | 3 ++- 16 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Thanks Tiejun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |