Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v03 01/10] xen: implement guest_physmap_pin_range

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 02.09.14 at 17:46, <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> @@ -514,6 +514,26 @@ void guest_physmap_remove_page(struct domain *d,
>  int guest_physmap_mark_populate_on_demand(struct domain *d, unsigned long 
> gfn,
>                                            unsigned int order);
>  
> +static inline int guest_physmap_pin_range(struct domain *d,
> +                                          paddr_t mfn,

So why are MFNs here being typed as paddr_t rather than
unsigned long?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel