|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][v3][PATCH 3/6] tools:firmware:hvmloader: reserve RMRR mappings in e820
On 15/08/14 09:27, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> We need to reserve all RMRR mappings in e820 to avoid any
> potential guest memory conflict.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c | 94
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h | 6 +++
> tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c | 16 +++++++
> tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
> index 2e05e93..7f54eab 100644
> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
> @@ -68,12 +68,89 @@ void dump_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820, unsigned int
> nr)
> }
> }
Please apply Xen coding style to all of this file - there are a lot of
errors.
>
> +static unsigned int construct_rmrr_e820_maps(unsigned int nr,
> + struct rmrr_map *e820_rmrr_map,
> + struct e820entry *e820)
> +{
> + unsigned int i = 0, j = 0, m = 0, sum_nr = 0;
> + uint64_t start, end, rmrr_start, rmrr_end;
> + unsigned int insert = 0, do_insert = 0;
> +
> +do_real_construct:
> + sum_nr = nr + e820_rmrr_map->nr_map;
> + for ( i = 0; i < e820_rmrr_map->nr_map; i++ )
> + {
> + rmrr_start = e820_rmrr_map->map[i].addr;
> + rmrr_end = e820_rmrr_map->map[i].addr +
> + e820_rmrr_map->map[i].size + 1;
> +
> + for ( j = 0; j < nr; j++ )
> + {
> + end = e820[j].addr + e820[j].size;
> + start = e820[j+1].addr;
> +
> + /* Between those existing e820 entries. */
> + if ( (rmrr_start > end) && (rmrr_end < start) )
> + {
> + if (do_insert)
> + {
> + /* Move to free this entry. */
> + for ( m = sum_nr - 1; m > j; m-- )
> + {
> + e820[m].addr = e820[m-1].addr;
> + e820[m].size = e820[m-1].size;
> + e820[m].type = e820[m-1].type;
> + }
> +
> + /* Then fill RMRR into that entry. */
> + e820[j+1].addr = rmrr_start;
> + e820[j+1].size = rmrr_end - rmrr_start;
> + e820[j+1].type = E820_RESERVED;
> + nr++;
> + }
> + insert++;
> + }
> + /* Already at the end. */
> + else if ( (rmrr_start > end) && !start )
> + {
> + if (do_insert)
> + {
> + e820[nr].addr = rmrr_start;
> + e820[nr].size = rmrr_end - rmrr_start;
> + e820[nr].type = E820_RESERVED;
> + nr++;
> + }
> + insert++;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Just return if done. */
> + if (do_insert)
> + return nr;
> +
> + /* Fine to construct RMRR mappings into e820. */
> + if ( insert == e820_rmrr_map->nr_map)
> + {
> + do_insert = 1;
> + goto do_real_construct;
> + }
> + /* Overlap. */
> + else
> + {
> + printf("RMRR overlap with thoese existing e820 entries!\n");
> + printf("So we don't construct RMRR mapping in e820!\n");
> + }
> +
> + return nr;
> +}
> /* Create an E820 table based on memory parameters provided in hvm_info. */
> int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
> unsigned int lowmem_reserved_base,
> unsigned int bios_image_base)
> {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> + struct rmrr_map *rmrr_maps;
>
> if ( !lowmem_reserved_base )
> lowmem_reserved_base = 0xA0000;
> @@ -169,6 +246,23 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
> nr++;
> }
>
> + /* We'd better reserve RMRR mapping for each VM to avoid potential
> + * memory conflict.
> + */
> + rmrr_maps = get_rmrr_map_info();
> + if ( rmrr_maps->nr_map )
> + {
> + if ( (nr + rmrr_maps->nr_map) > E820MAX )
> + {
> + printf(" No free space to insert all RMRR mapping entry!!\n");
> + return nr;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + nr = construct_rmrr_e820_maps(nr, rmrr_maps, e820);
> + }
> + }
> +
> return nr;
> }
>
> diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h
> index b2ead7f..a61b80b 100644
> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h
> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ struct e820entry {
> uint32_t type;
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> +#define E820MAX 128
> +
> +struct rmrr_map {
> + unsigned int nr_map;
> + struct e820entry map[E820MAX];
> +};
> #endif /* __HVMLOADER_E820_H__ */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c
> index 80d822f..f63434a 100644
> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c
> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c
> @@ -766,6 +766,22 @@ struct shared_info *get_shared_info(void)
> return shared_info;
> }
>
> +struct rmrr_map *get_rmrr_map_info(void)
> +{
> + static int no_rmrr = 1;
> +
> + if ( no_rmrr == 0 )
> + return &rmrr_e820map;
> +
> + if ( hypercall_memory_op(XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map,
> + &rmrr_e820map) != 0 )
This *only* works because you are not passing a xen_rmrr_memory_map_t as
per the hypercall definition, and Xen is clobbering your heap in a way
which matches the hvmloader layout.
> + BUG();
> +
> + no_rmrr = 0;
> +
> + return &rmrr_e820map;
> +}
> +
> uint16_t get_cpu_mhz(void)
> {
> struct shared_info *shared_info = get_shared_info();
> diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h
> index a70e4aa..5f48a86 100644
> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h
> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h
> @@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ unsigned long create_pir_tables(void);
> void smp_initialise(void);
>
> #include "e820.h"
> +struct rmrr_map rmrr_e820map;
Unless I am mistaken, this will put an rmrr_map object named
rmrr_e820map in each translation unit which includes util.h I suspect
it is not what you actually want to do.
~Andrew
> +struct rmrr_map *get_rmrr_map_info(void);
> int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
> unsigned int lowmem_reserved_base,
> unsigned int bios_image_base);
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |