|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Possible problem emulating movntq, movss
>>> On 06.08.14 at 14:16, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 06.08.14 at 12:47, <vlutas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 8/6/2014 12:54 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 06.08.14 at 10:57, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> We found that our HVM guests froze when trying to emulate movntq
>>>> instructions. The solution seems to be to replace "goto done;" with
>>>> "break;" at line 4191 (when handling "case 0x7f:") in
>>>> xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c. Otherwise the writeback part
>>>> doesn't happen.
>>>>
>>>> If you're happy with the fix I can prepare a patch, otherwise please let
>>>> me know if we're missing something.
>>> No, that doesn't look right: There's nothing left to be written back at
>>> that point (registers get updated with the instruction executed via the
>>> on-stack stub, and memory gets written with immediately preceding
>>> ops->write(). So without you being more specific about _what_ you
>>> see going wrong I don't think I can give further advice.
>> Except for maybe the instruction pointer? That doesn't seem to be updated
>> anywhereexcept during the write-back phase (or maybe I'm missing the spot).
>> The problem is that the guest gets stuck with the instruction pointer
>> pointing to the sameinstruction (in our particular case it is
>> "MOVDQU xmm0, xmmword ptr [rdx + rcx - 0x10]"),entering in an infinite
>> loop (EPT violation - emulate), since the IP doesn't seem to be updated.
>
> Now that is indeed a problem, but not solved by simply replacing
> the "goto done" with "break". I'll look into getting you a proper fix.
Mind giving this one (lightly tested only) a try?
Jan
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -720,29 +720,26 @@ do{ uint8_t stub[] = { _bytes, 0xc3 };
put_fpu(&fic); \
} while (0)
-static unsigned long __get_rep_prefix(
- struct cpu_user_regs *int_regs,
- struct cpu_user_regs *ext_regs,
+static unsigned long _get_rep_prefix(
+ const struct cpu_user_regs *int_regs,
int ad_bytes)
{
- unsigned long ecx = ((ad_bytes == 2) ? (uint16_t)int_regs->ecx :
- (ad_bytes == 4) ? (uint32_t)int_regs->ecx :
- int_regs->ecx);
-
- /* Skip the instruction if no repetitions are required. */
- if ( ecx == 0 )
- ext_regs->eip = int_regs->eip;
-
- return ecx;
+ return (ad_bytes == 2) ? (uint16_t)int_regs->ecx :
+ (ad_bytes == 4) ? (uint32_t)int_regs->ecx :
+ int_regs->ecx;
}
#define get_rep_prefix() ({ \
unsigned long max_reps = 1; \
if ( rep_prefix() ) \
- max_reps = __get_rep_prefix(&_regs, ctxt->regs, ad_bytes); \
+ max_reps = _get_rep_prefix(&_regs, ad_bytes); \
if ( max_reps == 0 ) \
- goto done; \
- max_reps; \
+ { \
+ /* Skip the instruction if no repetitions are required. */ \
+ dst.type = OP_NONE; \
+ goto writeback; \
+ } \
+ max_reps; \
})
static void __put_rep_prefix(
@@ -3921,7 +3918,8 @@ x86_emulate(
if ( !rc && (b & 1) && (ea.type == OP_MEM) )
rc = ops->write(ea.mem.seg, ea.mem.off, mmvalp,
ea.bytes, ctxt);
- goto done;
+ dst.type = OP_NONE;
+ break;
}
case 0x20: /* mov cr,reg */
@@ -4188,7 +4186,8 @@ x86_emulate(
if ( !rc && (b != 0x6f) && (ea.type == OP_MEM) )
rc = ops->write(ea.mem.seg, ea.mem.off, mmvalp,
ea.bytes, ctxt);
- goto done;
+ dst.type = OP_NONE;
+ break;
}
case 0x80 ... 0x8f: /* jcc (near) */ {
Attachment:
x86emul-IP-updates.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |